The State Bar of California
  • Log in
  • News
  • Forms
  • Contact
About Us:
  • Our Mission
  • |
  • Who We Are
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • Careers
  • |
  • Business Opportunities
  • Public
    • Need Legal Help
      • Look Up a Lawyer
      • Certified Lawyer Referral Services Directory
        • LRS FAQs for Consumers
        • File a Complaint about an LRS
        • How to Become a Certified LRS
      • Using a Certified Lawyer Referral Service
      • Free Legal Help
    • Complaints & Claims
      • How to File a Complaint
        • Before You File
        • Why File a Complaint
        • After You File
        • Attorney Complaint
        • Nonattorney Complaint
        • Discipline Referral
      • Unauthorized Practice of Law Complaint
        • After You File
      • Fee Disputes
        • FAQ
      • Client Security Fund
        • Client Security Fund Application Process
        • Application Instructions
      • Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
        • Certified Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
        • Uncertified Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
      • FAQ
    • Free Legal Information
      • Before Selecting an Attorney
        • Finding the Right Lawyer
        • What a Certified Lawyer Referral Service Can Do for You
          • How a Certified Lawyer Referral Service Works
        • Your Initial Consultation
      • Working with an Attorney
        • What to Expect from Your Attorney
        • How to Work with Your Lawyer
        • What to Expect Regarding Fees and Billing
        • How to Avoid Problems
      • Resolving Problems
        • Problem with a Lawyer
        • Lawyer Fee Dispute
          • Lawyer Fee Dispute FAQ
        • Client Security Fund
      • Unauthorized Practice of Law
        • Avoiding Fraud by Immigration Consultants
        • Práctica no autorizada de la abogacía
        • Evite el fraude por parte de los consultores de inmigración
      • For Immigrants
        • Buscando ayuda con asuntos de inmigración
        • Immigration Legal Services Providers
        • Proveedores de servicios legales de inmigración
      • For Veterans & Service Members
      • Legal Help After a Disaster
      • Legal Guide Pamphlets
      • FAQ
    • Discipline
      • Attorney Discipline
      • Nonattorney Actions
      • Discipline Statistics
    • En español
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
      • Protecting the Public
        • Regulation Overview
        • Public Comment
          • Public Comment Guidelines
          • Public Comment Archives
            • 2021 Public Comment
            • 2020 Public Comment
            • 2019 Public Comment
            • 2018 Public Comment
            • 2017 Public Comment
              • 2017-12
            • 2016 Public Comment
            • 2015 Public Comment
            • 2014 Public Comment
            • 2013 Public Comment
            • 2012 Public Comment
            • 2011 Public Comment
            • 2010 Public Comment
        • Reports
        • Public Records
      • Promoting Justice in California
      • Promoting Inclusion and Diversity
    • Who We Are
      • Board of Trustees
        • Roster
        • Meetings
        • Public Comment Guidelines
        • Supreme Court Appointments
        • Board Task Force
      • Committees
        • Meetings
        • Ad Hoc Commission on the Discipline System
          • Roster
        • Blue Ribbon Commission
        • California Board of Legal Specialization
        • California Paraprofessional Program Working Group
        • Client Security Fund Commission
          • Roster
        • Closing the Justice Gap Working Group
          • Roster
        • Committee of Bar Examiners
        • Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct
        • Committee of State Bar Accredited and Registered Schools
          • Roster
        • Council on Access and Fairness
          • Roster
        • Judicial Nominees Evaluation
          • Background
          • Appointments
          • Roster
          • FAQ
          • JNE Demographics Reports
        • Law School Council
          • Roster
        • Lawyer Assistance Program Oversight Committee
          • Roster
        • Legal Services Trust Fund Commission
          • Roster
      • Archived Committees
      • Staff
    • News
      • Fact Sheets
      • Reports
      • Multimedia
      • Public Meetings Calendar
      • California Bar Journal Archive
    • Careers
      • How to Apply
      • San Francisco Careers
      • Los Angeles Careers
      • Benefits
      • Salary
    • Business Opportunities
      • Previous Opportunities
  • Attorneys
    • Attorney Regulation
      • About Your State Bar Profile
        • Fees & Payment
          • Agency Billing
          • Annual Fees FAQs
          • Voluntary Contributions
          • Fees and Charges
        • Status Changes
        • Address Change
        • Reporting Requirements
        • Certificate of Standing
        • FAQ
      • Fingerprinting Rule Requirements
        • For In-State Attorneys
        • For Out-of-State Attorneys
        • For Out-of-Country Attorneys
          • Out-of-Country Deadline Extension Request
        • Multijurisdictional Practitioner
        • FAQ
        • Penalty Schedule
        • Limited Accommodations
        • Glossary
      • Lawyer Assistance Program
        • LAP Services
        • Counseling LAP
        • Resources
        • FAQ
      • Opening and Managing Law Office
        • Insurance Programs
        • Limited Liability Partnerships
          • FAQ
          • Forms
          • Rules
        • Law Corporations Program
          • FAQ
          • Forms
          • Rules
        • Revoking Law Corporation
      • Mandatory Fee Arbitration
        • Approved Programs
        • Forms & Resources
        • Arbitration Advisories
      • For Judges
      • FAQ
    • MCLE & CLE
      • Requirements
        • Types of MCLE Credit
        • Proportional Requirement
        • MCLE Recordkeeping
        • Attorney Exemptions
        • Approved Jurisdictions
        • Education Approval
          • Evaluate Credit
          • MCLE Credit Request
        • New Admittees
        • Inactive or Not Eligible Status
        • Out-of-State Residents
        • Good Cause Modification
        • FAQ
      • Compliance
        • Who Must Report Compliance
        • Compliance Groups
        • FAQ
      • New Attorney Training Program
      • E-Learning Portal
      • MCLE Providers
        • Provider Search
        • Single Activity Provider Status
        • Multiple Activity Provider Status
        • Provider Records
        • Qualifying Activities
        • ADA
      • CLE
        • CLE Calendar
        • Online CLE
        • CLE Self-Study
      • Rules
        • Rules Specific MCLE Credits
      • FAQ
    • Conduct & Discipline
      • Lawyer Regulation
      • Self-Reporting FAQ
      • State Bar Court
      • Client Trust Accounting & IOLTA
        • Guidelines
        • Client Trust Accounting Handbook
        • Client Trust Accounting Resources
        • Update Form
        • Financial Institutions
          • Eligible Institutions
        • Interest Rates
        • FAQ
      • Rules
        • Rules of the State Bar
          • Title 1 Global Provisions
          • Title 2 Rights and Responsibilities of Licensees
          • Title 3 Programs and Services
          • Title 4 Admissions and Educational Standards
          • Title 5 Discipline
          • Title 6 Governance
          • Title 7 Miscellaneous
          • Appendixes
          • New and Amended Rules
        • Rules of Professional Conduct
          • Current Rules
            • Chapter 1. Lawyer-Client Relationship
            • Chapter 2. Counselor
            • Chapter 3. Advocate
            • Chapter 4. Transactions with Persons Other than Clients
            • Chapter 5. Law Firms and Associations
            • Chapter 6. Public Service
            • Chapter 7. Information About Legal Services
            • Chapter 8. Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession
          • Previous Rules
        • Selected Legal Authority
          • Constitution Excerpts
          • The State Bar Act
          • California Rules of Court
          • Statutes
      • Ethics
        • Hotline
        • Opinions
          • 2009-176 to Present
          • 1998-152 to 2008-175
          • 1992-126 to 1997-151
          • 1988-96 to 1991-125
          • 1984-76 to 1987-95
          • 1979-48 to 1983-75
          • 1971-24 to 1977-47
          • 1965-1 to 1970-23
        • Professional Competence
        • Ethics Schools
          • Class Schedule
          • Registration
        • Ethics & Technology Resources
          • Ethics Opinions Related to Technology
          • Ethics Articles on Technology
          • Online Participatory MCLE Programs
          • Online Communication
          • Electronic Files
          • Law Firm Websites
          • Social Media
          • Internet/Email Scams
          • Miscellaneous
        • Senior Lawyers Resources
          • Rules
          • Opinions
          • Publications
            • Wellness Guide
          • Articles
          • MCLE
          • Links
          • Closing a Law Practice
          • Contact Us
          • Attorney Surrogacy
        • ADA Claims Information
        • Judicial Ethics
        • Attorney Civility and Professionalism
        • Publications
          • Ethics News
          • Hotliner Articles
            • Archives
          • Pub 250
          • Compendium on Professional Responsibility Index
        • Committees
          • COPRAC
            • Education
              • Ethics Symposium
            • Opinion Requests
            • Rules
            • Roster
          • Rules Revision
            • Rules Commission 2017
              • Summaries
              • Proposed Rules
              • Roster
            • Rules Commission 2014
              • Action Summaries
              • Meetings
              • Roster
    • Ethics
    • Legal Specialization
      • About Certified Specialization
      • Becoming a Certified Specialist
        • Exam Information
          • Exam Preparation Information
          • Laptop Computers
          • Testing Accommodations
      • Current Certified Specialists
      • Legal Specialty Areas
      • Specialist Search
      • MCLE Requirements for Certified Specialists
      • Education Providers
      • Governance
        • Board of Legal Specialization
          • Roster
      • Rules & Standards
        • Advertising
      • FAQ
    • Volunteer
      • Special Master
        • FAQ
        • Rules
        • List
  • Admissions
    • Requirements
      • Registration
      • Education
        • Pre-Legal Education
          • College Equivalency Education
        • Legal Education
          • Fixed Facility
          • Correspondence or Distance Learning
          • Law Office or Judge's Chamber
          • Foreign Education
            • Foreign Law Degree
      • Social Security Exemption
      • Attorney Applicants
    • Examinations
      • Dates and Deadlines
      • California Bar Examination
        • February 2021 California Bar Exam
        • February 2021 Bar Exam FAQs
        • Admittance Bulletin
        • Post Exam FAQs
        • Laptops for Bar Exam
        • California Bar Examination Scope
        • Exam Results Information
          • Bar Exam Pass List
        • Past Exams
        • Grading
        • Scaling
        • Refund of Fees Policy
        • Attorney Oath
      • First-Year Law Students' Examination
        • Admittance Bulletin
        • First-Year Exam Information
        • Laptops for First-Year Exam
        • Exam Results Information
        • First-Year Exam Grading and Scope
      • Exam Rules
      • Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
      • Requesting Testing Accommodations
      • Exam Administration
        • Becoming a Grader
        • Becoming a Proctor
    • Moral Character
      • Moral Character Statement
      • Governing Law
      • Process
      • Factors and Conduct
      • Further Investigation and Informal Conferences
      • Guidelines
    • Special Admissions
      • Multijurisdictional Practice (MJP) Program
        • MJP Program Requirements and Process
        • MJP Program Types
      • Pro Hac Vice
      • Out-of-State Attorney Arbitration Counsel (OSAAC)
      • Foreign Legal Consultants (FLC)
        • FAQ
        • Foreign Legal Consultants List
      • Practical Training of Law Students
      • Provisionally Licensed Lawyers
        • Search
    • Law School Regulation
      • Law Schools
      • Committee of Bar Examiners Meetings
        • Minutes
        • Minutes Archive
        • Roster
      • Exam Statistics
  • Access to Justice
    • Initiatives
      • California Justice Gap Study
        • Justice Gap Study Survey Data
        • California Law Student Survey Data
      • Publications
      • Leadership Banks
    • Pro Bono
      • Pro Bono Directory
        • Central Coast and Eastern Sierra Pro Bono Directory
        • Central Valley Area Pro Bono Directory
        • Los Angeles Area Pro Bono Directory
        • Sacramento and Northern California Pro Bono Directory
        • San Diego Area Pro Bono Directory
        • San Francisco Area Pro Bono Directory
        • Statewide Pro Bono Directory
      • Pro Bono Practice Program
      • Volunteer After a Disaster
      • Volunteer Opportunities to Assist Veterans and Service Members
      • FAQ
    • Legal Aid Grants
      • 2021 Grant Recipients
      • Applicant Information
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Lawyer Referral Services
  • 2021 Public Comment
Seal of The State Bar of California The State Bar of California

Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 17-0003 [Duty to Prospective Client]

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Share with Email

The State Bar seeks public comment on Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 17-0003 (Duty to Prospective Client).

Deadline: March 22, 2021

Direct comments to

Comments should be submitted using the online Public Comment Form. The online form allows you to input your comments directly and can also be used to upload your comment letter and/or other attachments.

Background

The State Bar Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC) is charged with the task of issuing advisory opinions on the ethical propriety of hypothetical attorney conduct. In accordance with applicable State Bar policy and procedure, the committee shall publish proposed formal opinions for public comment (See, State Bar Board of Trustee Resolutions July 1979 and December 2004. See also, Board of Trustee Resolution November 2016).

On May 10, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued an order approving 69 new Rules of Professional Conduct, which went into effect on November 1, 2018. Information about the new rules is available here. Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 14-0001 interprets the new Rules of Professional Conduct.

Discussion/Proposal

Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 17-0003 considers:

  1.  When a prospective client has provided confidential information to an interviewing lawyer, may the interviewing lawyer disclose that information or use it to the prospective client’s disadvantage?
  2.  When the interviewing lawyer has received material confidential information from a prospective client, under what conditions is ethical screening available so that other lawyers in the lawyer’s law firm may represent other clients who are adverse to the prospective client in the same or substantially related matters? 
  3. To what extent can a prospective client give advanced informed written consent to permit other lawyers in an interviewing lawyer’s law firm to be adverse to a former prospective client in the same or substantially related matter in circumstances where the interviewing lawyer is screened from the representation but the precondition for screening in Rule 1.18 (d) has not been met because the interviewing lawyer did not take the “reasonable measures” required by that rule?

The opinion interprets rules 1.01(e), 1.4, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8.2, 1.9, 1.10, 1.16, and 1.18 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California; Business and Professions Code section 6068(e)(1).

The opinion digest states: When a person is a prospective client within the meaning of rule 1.18(a), the interviewing lawyer owes the prospective client the same duty of confidentiality owed to an existing or former client pursuant to rules 1.6 and 1.9 even though no lawyer-client relationship thereafter ensues. The lawyer may not use or disclose such information without the prospective client’s informed written consent. This is true even if the information would be material to the representation of an existing client of the lawyer or the lawyer’s law firm. The duty of confidentiality to the prospective client outweighs the duty to inform the current client.

An interviewing lawyer who receives material confidential information from a prospective client is prohibited from accepting representation materially adverse to the prospective client in the same or a substantially related matter absent informed written consent. That prohibition is imputed to other members of the law firm unless the interviewing lawyer took reasonable measures to obtain only information that is reasonably necessary to determine whether to represent the existing client and the law firm promptly undertook the screening measures specified in rule 1.18(d)(2). Reasonable measures include advising the client to provide only identified information that the lawyer reasonably needs to decide whether to undertake the representation and limiting questioning of the client so as to elicit only such information. The information reasonably necessary to determine whether to represent a prospective client is that which a reasonable lawyer in the situation of the interviewing attorney would require to determine whether the proposed representation was both ethically proper and economically acceptable. It includes information beyond what is required to determine whether the representation is ethically permissible to determine a conflict of interest, may include information as to whether the client’s position is tenable, and, in appropriate circumstances, may include information relating to the client’s reputation or financial condition, the merits of the claim, and the likely range of recoveries.

The prohibition against accepting a representation that is materially adverse to a prospective client resulting from the receipt of that prospective client’s material confidential information can be waived with the informed written consent of both the prospective client and any affected client of the law firm. A prospective client may give advance informed written consent to the law firm acting adversely to the prospective client in the same matter or substantially related matters.

At its September 11, 2020, meeting, and in accordance with their procedures, the Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct tentatively approved Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 17-0003 for a 90-day public comment distribution. Subsequently, at its January 8, 2021, meeting, COPRAC revised the opinion in response to public comment and approved Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 17-0003 for an additional 60-day public comment distribution.

Any fiscal/personnel impact

None

Background material
  • Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 17-0003
Source

Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct

Deadline

March 22, 2021

Direct comments to

Comments should be submitted using the online Public Comment Form. The online form allows you to input your comments directly and can also be used to upload your comment letter and/or other attachments.

Bar Seal
Protecting the public & enhancing the administration of justice.
  • Public
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Admissions
  • Access to Justice
  • News
  • Forms
  • Careers
  • Staff Log in
  • San Francisco (Main Office)
    180 Howard St.
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    415-538-2000
  • Los Angeles
    845 S. Figueroa St.
    Los Angeles, CA 90017
    213-765-1000
Copyright © 2020 The State Bar of California
  • FAQ
  • User Policies
  • Contact
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn