Competition is the official publication of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the California State Bar. The journal covers current issues and developments in the law of antitrust, unfair competition and trade regulation. A free annual subscription is a benefit of Section membership. Individual back issues and reprints of individual articles may be purchased contacting the Section.

PLEASE NOTE: Complete online versions of recent issues of Competition are published in the "Members Only" area.

CURRENT ISSUE
	Volume 18, No. 2, Spring 2009 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Socratic Solitaire – Implications of In Re Tobacco II for Proof Of Injury in Antitrust and Unfair Competition Class Actions Charles H. Samel In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation: A Forecast of The Future of Class Certification in the Ninth Circuit Caroline Mitchell And Michael Scott Meyer V. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.: The California Supreme Court Toughens Standing Requirements Under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act Daveed A. Schwartz Ashcroft V. Iqbal: The Supreme Court’s Attempt to Clarify Bell Atlantic V. Twombly Matthew Fischer
BACK ISSUES
	Volume 18, No. 1, Spring 2009 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair’s Column Elaine F. Foreman Editor’s Column John M. Landry Chinese Monopoly Law: A Practical Guide Xue Kepeng and Charlotte Zhanghaixia Westfall Privilege Survives Coerced Disclosures To Federal Investigators Bennett G. Young, Chris W. Lacy, Michael J. Kass and Kathryn A. Nyce Edwards V. Arthur Andersen Llp: The End Of Judicially Created Restraints On Competition Todd M. Malynn
	Volume 17, No. 2, Fall 2008 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair’s Column Kathleen J. Tuttle Editor’s Column Tom Hixson The Cartwright Act at 100 – Special Celebratory Issue Preface Hon. Ronald M. George, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of California Foreward: An Historical Backdrop Professor Spencer C. Olin One Hundred Years in the Making: The Cartwright Act In Broad Outline John M. Landry and Kirk A. Hornbeck A Legislator's Lament: Profile of George W. Cartwright (1863-1939) Kathleen J. Tuttle and Professor Gilbert Geis Does the Cartwright Act Have a Future? Lisa Saveri and Craig Corbitt Happy Birthday, Cartwright Act ! A Judge's Perspective on the Use of Questionaires In Jury Selection for Cartwright Act Cases Hon. Richard A. Kramer, Judge, San Francisco Superior Court Revisited History: a Retrospective on Von Kalinowski and Hanson’s “California Antitrust Laws: A Comparison With Federal Antitrust Laws,” Robert E. Cooper and James P. Clark The Cartwright Act at 100 – a History Of Complementary Antitrust Enforcement – A Celebration Don T. Hibner, Jr. and Heather M. Cooper How We Convinced The California Supreme Court That the Cartwright Act Did Not Regulate Mergers Aton Arbisser and M. Laurence Popofsky The “Federalization” of the Cartwright Act Bonny E. Sweeney Anti-monopolization Workarounds Professor Reza Dibadj Comments On The Recent History Of Class Actions Under The Cartwright Act Guido Saveri B.W.I., California’s Favorable Class Action Jurisprudence, And Their Post-Cafa Application Francis O. Scarpulla and Qianwei Fu Revitalizing the Cartwright Act John K. Van de Kamp and Michael J. Strumwasser A Century of Government Antitrust Enforcement Under the Cartwright Act Thomas Greene, Robert C. Fellmeth, Thomas A. Papageorge and Kathleen J. Tuttle California Versus Federal Enforcement of the Cartwright Act Against Microsoft – A Choice With Potentially Disastrous Consequences for Consumers Gene Crew A Forward Look: The Cartwright Act and What it Could Be Joseph L. Dunn Conclusion Hon. Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of California
	Volume 17, No. 1, Spring 2008 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Editor’s Column Tom Hixson Chair’s Column Kathleen J. Tuttle Table of Contents The Ninth Circuit’s Linkline Decision: a Flawed Application of Intracircuit Stare Decisis? John M. Landry and Bethany M. Stevens Negotiating Antitrust Provisions in Acquisition Agreements Craig Waldman and Jennifer DiNucci Judgment-sharing Agreements: Fair to Defendants or Another Anticompetitive Restraint? Daniel T. Dobrygowski Discovery Of European Commission Materials In U.s. Civil Antitrust Litigation: Does U.S. Discovery Threaten Europe’s Competition Enforcement Regime? Terry Calvani and Kate S. McMillan 2007 Developments in California Class Action Law Pamela M. Parker
	Volume 16, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2007 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair’s Column Bonny E. Sweeney Editor’s Column Mark Riera Antitrust Damages Claims Arising Out of the California Electricity Crisis: an Analysis Of Federal Jurisdiction, Preemption, And The Filed Rate Doctrine Geoffrey T. Holtz Filling The Regulatory Gap: California Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation Craig C. Corbitt and Jiangxiao Athena The Supreme Court’s Leegin Decision on Resale Price Maintenance: Maintaining Uncertainty Brian Robison and Soña Garcia Credit Suisse: Supreme Court Limits Antitrust Claims Arising From Regulated Investment Banking Activity Howard M.Ullman An Imbalance of Representation: A Critique of the Antitrust Modernization Commission Recommendations Regarding Civil Remedies in Private Antitrust Cases Joshua P. Davis Tying Law: the Clash Between the Supreme Court and Lower Courts M. Brian McMahon
	Volume 15, No. 2, Fall/Winter2006 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Whither The Robinson-patman Act? The Antitrust Modernization Commission Tackles A Wily Veteran Harvey I. Saferstein And Nada I. Shamonki Undoing The Ninth Circuit’s Chroma Lighting Decision: Is Volvo Too Much, too Little, too Late? John M. Landry Dagher: An Admirable Exercise In Restraint Joshua P. Davis, Joseph R. Saveri And Peter E. Leckman The Unfair Competition Law After Proposition 64: The California Supreme Court Speaks Kevin K. Green
	Volume 15, No. 1, Spring/Summer 2006 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair's Column Bruce Lee Simon Editor's Column Kathleen J. Tuttle The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: One Year Later Thomas S. Hixson Implications of the Class Action Fairness Act for Antitrust Cases: From Filing Through Trial Lisa Saveri A State-by-state Look At The Law On Indirect Purchaser Damage Actions Gerald E. Hawxhurst Market Competitiveness: Does State Antitrust Law Need To Be Updated? Don T. Hibner, Jr. and Heather M. Cooper
	Volume 14, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2005 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair’s Column Bruce Lee Simon Editor’s Column Kathleen J.tuttle Antitrust and the New Economy M. Howard Morse A Field Guide to Antitrust Issues in Standard Setting and Patent Pooling Willard K. Tom Fearing and Revering Intellectual Property: Misplaced Reliance on Presumptions in the Federal Circuit’s Independent Ink Scott A. Sher And Scott D. Russell “Schumpeterian” Competition And Antitrust Policy in High-Tech Markets Michael L. Katz And Howard A. Shelanski The Rise Of The Restrictive Product License Richard B. Ulmer And Paul A. Deeringer The Acquisition And Licensing Of Intellectual Property: Antitrust Implications Franklin D. Kang California Antitrust And Unfair Competition Law Update Thomas Greene And Thomas A. Papageorge
	Volume 14, No. 1, Spring/Summer 2005 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair's Column Holly A. House Private “Representative Actions” Under California’s Unfair Competition Law After Proposition 64: A Comparative Analysis Gerald E. Hawxhurst and Kevin Y. Teruya Proposition 64 Does Not Apply to Pending Cases Bonny E. Sweeney Proposition 64 Applies to Pending Cases Thomas S. Hixson Is Ucl Fraud Now Akin To Common Law Fraud? Reliance, Materiality and Causation After Proposition 64 Andrew B. Serwin and Russell L. Carlberg Problems in Partnering With Public Prosecutors Barbara M. Motz Have Unfair Competition Claims Become “federalized” After Proposition 64 and the Class Action Fairness Act? Amy Darby and Amy Maclear California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update Thomas Greene and Thomas A. Papageorge
	Volume 13, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2004-2005 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair's Column Holly A. House Editors' Column Shawn D. Parrish and Kathleen J. Tuttle The Trinko Case: Rise of a Restrictive Approach to Section 2 Analysis, and Fall of the Duty to Cooperate with Rivals Howard M. Ullman The Availability of Damages for Monopolization Under California Law Charles H. Samels What is "Unfair"? Developments in 17200 Law After Cel-Tech Daniel K. Slaughter The Legality of Patent Licensing Schemes Under the Antitrust Laws Pamela Pham
	Volume 13, No. 1, Spring 2004 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair’s Column Carlton A.Varner Editors' Column Shawn D. Parrish Potential Impacts of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2004 Peter E. Borkon The Plight of Nascent Competitors in the Ninth Circuit After Bourns v. Raychem John M. Landry Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.: Preliminary Injunctions - Enforcing California’s Fundamental Policy in Section 16600 Against Out-of-State Employers Todd M. Malynn JRS Products v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America: Contract, Not Tort Damages for Franchise Terminations Shawn D. Parrish and Adrienne S. Leight California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update Thomas Greene and Thomas A. Papageorg
	Volume 12, No. 1, Summer 2003 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair's Column Daniel J. Mogin Editor's Column Carlton A. Varner The George Court and Economic Welfare J. Thomas Rosch Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.: California Rejoins the Union Bernice Conn Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.: The ABC's of Antisuit Injunctions -- Enforcing California's Fundamental Policy in Section 16600 Against Out-of-State Employers Todd M. Malynn and Michael J. Weber The Korea Supply Decision: Monterey Relief Remedies Under the UCL Carlton Varner
	Volume 11, No. 2, Winter 2002-2003 [Posted in the Members Only Area]
Chair's Column Daniel J. Mogin Editor's Column Carlton A. Varner California's Unfair Competition Law: Regulatory Balance or Unlevel Playing Field? J. Clark Kelso Conspiracies and Summary Judgment in SHerman ection 1 Cases: Judge Postner Takes on the Ninth Circuit The Silver Anniversary of an Antitrust Sea-Change: Continental T.V. and Brunswick at Twenty-Five Don T. Hibner, Jr. and Andrea B. Hasegawa
	Volume 11, No. 1, Spring 2002

Chair's Column
Jeffrey I. Weinberger

Editor's Column
Bradley S. Phillips

Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.: A New Standard for Summary Judgment Motions in California Antitrust Cases
Shawn D. Parrish

How "Federal" Is California Summary Judgment Law After Aguilar?
Charles M. Kagay

California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Developments
Thomas A. Papageorge and Thomas J. Greene

New Uniform Class Action Procedures
Daniel J. Mogin

Federal Antitrust Law Update
Thomas E. Kauper

Volume 10, No. 1, Summer/Fall 2001

Chair's Column
Roxane Polidora, Pillsbury, Winthrop LLP

Editor's Column
Bradley S. Phillips, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP

An Overview of Indirect Purchaser Actions and Class Certification
Bruce L. Simon, Cotchett, Pitre & Simon, Burlingame

Economics of Class Certification in Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Cases
Samid Hussain, Ph.D., Daniel M. Garrett, Ph.D., and Vandy M. Howell, Ph.D., Cornerstone Research, Menlo Park

An Antitrust Counselor's Guide to Most-Favored-Nations Clauses
Sean P. Gates, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP

Volume 9, No. 1, Summer/Fall 2000

Chair's Column
Charles Crompton, Latham & Watkins (1999-200); Roxane A. Polidora, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP (2000-2001)

Editors' Column
Holly A. House, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP; Carlton A. Varner, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP

California's Unfair Competition Law After Kraus and Cortez: The Supreme Court Reins in the "Non-Class" Class Actiont
Roxane A. Polidora, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP; James L. Heideman, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP

Unilateral Refusals to LIcense Intellectual Property: The Federal Circuit Rejects the Ninth Circuit's Subjective Motivation Test
Donn Picket, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP

Myths of Predatory Pricing
Kent P. Anderson, Ph.D., National Economic Research Associates, Inc. (NERA)

Franchisee Protection: "A Lion in the Street" -- Analysis of the Proposed Small Business Franchise Act
Don T. Hibner, Jr., Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP

Feature: Developments -- Civil Procedure
Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Feature: Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Volume 8, No. 2, Fall 1999

Chair's Column
Mary B. Cranston, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP

Editors' Column
Roxane A. Polidora and Caroline N. Mitchell, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP

Business & Professions Code Section 17200: Taking a "Fairness" Case to Judgment
Robert C. Phelps, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro LLP

AT&T Corporation v. City of Portland: The Collision of Cable Operators, ISPs, and Local Government
Scott Andrew Sher, Clerk for Judge Charles A. Legge, District Court, Northern District of California

Reasonable Restrictive Covenants -- Recent Misinterpretations of Section 16600 of California's Business and Professions Code
James O'M. Tingle, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP

Feature: Developments -- Civil Procedure
Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Feature: Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Volume 8, No. 1, Spring 1999

Chair's Column
Mary B. Cranston, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP

Editors' Column
Roxane A. Polidora and Caroline N. Mitchell, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP

"Inevitable" Disclosure of Trade Secrets: The Seductive Power of the Dark Side
Ian N. Feinberg, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich

Asserting Intellecutal Property Rights in Monopoly Leveraging Antitrust Cases: Business Justification or Pretext?
William N. Herbert, Coudert Brothers

Maximum Resale Price Maintenance Under the Cartwright Act
Brian C. Burr and John F. McLean, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP and Fiona W. Huang, National Association of Public Interest Law

What's So Unfair About Unfair Competition? Section 17200 and Life After Cel-Tech
Timothy P. Crudo and Michael A. Velthoen, Latham & Watkins

Volume 7, No. 3, Summer 1998

Chair's Column
John H. Brinsley, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP

Editor's Column
Charles M. Kagay, Spiegel Liao & Kagay

Some Important Implications of ABC International Traders: A Reprieve for Dealer Termination Claims, and a Wake Up Call for Price Discrimination in Technology Licensing
Jesse W. Markham, Jr., Jackson, Tufts, Cole & Black, LLP

As Easy as ABC: Applycing the Rule Against Secondary-Line Price Discrimination to California Intrastate Transactions
Leighton M. Anderson, Offices of Leighton of Leighton M. Anderson

Features: Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Features: Antitrust Law Developments -- Civil Procedure
Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Volume 6, No. 1, Summer 1997

Chair's Column
Jesse W. Markham, Jr., Jackson Tufts Cole & Black

Editor's Column
Jeffrey M. Shohet, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich

An Economic Evaluation of B.W.I. Custom Kitchens and Indirect Purchase Classes in Horizontal Price-Fixing Cases
Gregory D. Adams, Law and Economics Consulting Group, Inc.; and Gordon C. Rausser, College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley and Law and Economics Consulting Group, Inc.

Most Favored Nations Clauses Are No Longer the Most Favored
Lori A. Schechter, Morrison & Foerster

Features: Antitrust Law Developments -- Civil Procedure
Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Volume 5, No. 2, Spring 1996

Chair's Column
J. Thomas Rosch, Latham & Watkins

Editor's Column
William I. Rothbard, Law Offices of William I. Rothbard

California False Advertising Law
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

The First Amendment, Commercial Adveritsing & Consumer Protection -- Color It Green
Albert Norman Shelden, Consumer Law Section, California Attorney General's Office

Music and the Right of Publicity in Commercial Advertising
Stuart L. Friedel and Howard Weingrad, Davis & Gilbert

"Antitrust Injury" Is Alive and Well Under the Cartwright Act
Mark LeHocky, Freeland Cooper LeHocky & Hamburg

Antitrust Law Developments
Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Volume 5, No. 1, Summer 1995

Chair's Column
Penelope A. Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster

Editor's Column
Jeffrey M. Shohet, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich

Representation of the General Public Under California's Unfair Competition Act
Professor Robert C. Fellmeth, University of San Diego Law School

The Lesson of Manufacturers Life: Implied Repeal of State Antitrust Laws Gets Even Tougher
Eugene Crew and Paul Kirsch, Townsend and Townsend and Crew

Cellular Plus: New Life for Cartwright Act Enforcement
Timothy F. Perry, Attorney-at-Law, San Francisco

Antitrust Developments -- Civil Procedure
Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Volume 4, No. 3, Winter 1995

Special Issue on Health Care Antitrust

Marketing the Network -- The Limits of Leverage
Michael A. Duncheon, Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy

Structuring Provider Contracting Networks to Avoid Per Se Illegal Price Fixing -- Before and After the DOJ/FTC Healthcare Policy Statement
Robert J. Enders, Weissburg and Aronson

Editor's Column
Erika Wodinsky, Federal Trade Commission

Chairman's Column
Penelope A. Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster

Feature: Physician Staff Privilege Antitrust Actions: An Uphill Battle
Peter K. Huston, Latham & Watkins

New Board Members

New Health Care Policy Statements

Volume 4, No. 2, Fall 1994

An Interview With Richard Gilbert

Counterpoint: Will the Guidelines Work?
Robert P. Taylor, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro

Editor's Column
Jesse W. Markham, Jr., Orrick Herringon et al. LLP

Chairman's Column
Thomas Greene, California Attorney General's Office

Feature: Antitrust Developments
Thomas A. Papgeorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Intellectual Property Licensing: The Practitioner's Perspective
Penelope A. Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster

Diagnostic Software: Antitrust and Copyright Law at War
Paul H. Roeder, Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich

Volume 4, No. 1, Winter 1994

Chairman's Column
Thomas Greene, California Attorney General's Office

Editor's Column
Jesse W. Markham, Jr.

Antitrust Developments
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Feature: Unfair Practices Act: The Problem of New Entrants
Roy Weinstein and Gail Fruchtman, Micronomics, Inc.

Feature: Insurance Antitrust: Litigation Update
Dean Hanswell, LeBoef, Lamb, Greene & MacRae

1994-1995 Appointments to State Bar Committees

Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law Section 1994 Programs

Volume 3, Spring 1993

Chair's Column
Gary R. Spratling, Esq.

Antitrust Developments
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Feature: The Supreme Court Overrules Lessig
Paul H. Roeder and Jeffrey M. Shohet, Gray, Cary Ames & Frye

Feature: Antitrust Offenses and Compliance Programs Under the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines
Paul A. Winick, Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges

Feature: Profile of Section Officers

Complex Litigation Inn of Court (CLIC): Accepting Applications for 1993
Chris Leong, Esq.

Volume 2, Summer 1992

Chair's Column
Eliot G. Disner, Shapiro, Possel & Close

Editor's Column
Karen Randall, Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman

Feature: Alaska Airlines: The Ninth Circuit Refines Essential Facilities and Rejects Monopoly Leveraging
George C. Leal, Vogl & Meredith

Feature: Can a Lawsuit with Probable Cause Be a Sham? Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. (cert. granted, Mar. 30, 1992, 112 S.Ct. 1557, 118 L.Ed.2d 206)
Robert M. Lindquist, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz

Volume 2, Winter/Spring 1992

Message from the Chair
Eliot G. Disner, Esq.

Message from the Outgoing Chair
Minda R. Schecter, Graham James

Feature: Senator Cartwright and His Antitrust Law
Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Feature: Antitrust Enforcement Directions at the Department of Justice
Remarks of James F. Rill, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Before the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Section of the State Bar of California on January 11, 1991, Los Angeles, California

"Unfair Trade Practices" Program a Success

Volume 1, No. 2, Fall 1990

Message from the Chair
Francis O. Scarpulla, Esq.

Antitrust Developments
Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Feature: State Tort Law: A Reasonable Alternative to a Federal Antitrust Predatory Pricing Claim
R. Mark McCareins, Winston & Strawn

Message from the State Bar: Are You Misunderstood?
John M. Seitman, State Bar Board of Governors

Section Annual Report: Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law Section, The State Bar of California, 1989-1990 Bar Year

Section Programs on Videotape

Volume 1, No. 1, 1990

Message from the Chair
Francis O. Scarpulla, Esq.

Introducing "Competition"
Thomas A. Papgeorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Feature: Antitrust Enforcement and Health Care: Current Developments and Future Trends
Remarks by Robert E. Bloch, Chief, Professions and Intellectual Property Section, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Before the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law Section of the State Bar of California and the Antitrust Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Asssociation, Biltmore Hotel, Los Angeles, California, October 25, 1989

Feature: What Is Left of Municipal Antitrust Liability?
Kendall H. MacVey, Best, Best & Krieger

President's Message
Alan Rothenberg, President, State Bar of California

Legislation Update: Law Library Funding -- The Struggle Continues: Report from the Sacramento Office of Governmental Affairs
Tony Nevarez, Legislative Representative