|
Rule 2-100 Communication With
a Represented Party
(A) While representing a client, a member shall
not communicate directly or indirectly about the subject of the
representation with a party the member knows to be represented by
another lawyer in the matter, unless the member has the consent of
the other lawyer.
(B) For purposes of this rule, a "party"
includes:
(1) An officer, director, or managing agent of
a corporation or association, and a partner or managing agent of a
partnership; or
(2) An association member or an employee of an
association, corporation, or partnership, if the subject of the
communication is any act or omission of such person in connection
with the matter which may be binding upon or imputed to the
organization for purposes of civil or criminal liability or whose
statement may constitute an admission on the part of the
organization.
(C) This rule shall not prohibit:
(1) Communications with a public officer,
board, committee, or body; or
(2) Communications initiated by a party seeking
advice or representation from an independent lawyer of the party's
choice; or
(3) Communications otherwise authorized by
law.
Discussion:
Rule 2-100 is intended to control
communications between a member and persons the member knows to be
represented by counsel unless a statutory scheme or case law will
override the rule. There are a number of express statutory schemes
which authorize communications between a member and person who
would otherwise be subject to this rule. These statutes protect a
variety of other rights such as the right of employees to organize
and to engage in collective bargaining, employee health and safety,
or equal employment opportunity. Other applicable law also includes
the authority of government prosecutors and investigators to
conduct criminal investigations, as limited by the relevant
decisional law.
Rule 2-100 is not intended to prevent the
parties themselves from communicating with respect to the subject
matter of the representation, and nothing in the rule prevents a
member from advising the client that such communication can be
made. Moreover, the rule does not prohibit a member who is also a
party to a legal matter from directly or indirectly communicating
on his or her own behalf with a represented party. Such a member
has independent rights as a party which should not be abrogated
because of his or her professional status. To prevent any possible
abuse in such situations, the counsel for the opposing party may
advise that party (1) about the risks and benefits of
communications with a lawyer-party, and (2) not to accept or engage
in communications with the lawyer-party.
Rule 2-100 also addresses the situation in
which member A is contacted by an opposing party who is represented
and, because of dissatisfaction with that party's counsel, seeks
A's independent advice. Since A is employed by the opposition, the
member cannot give independent advice.
As used in paragraph (A), "the subject of the
representation," "matter," and "party" are not limited to a
litigation context.
Paragraph (B) is intended to apply only to
persons employed at the time of the communication. (See Triple A
Machine Shop, Inc. v. State of California (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d
131 [261 Cal.Rptr. 493].)
Subparagraph (C)(2) is intended to permit a
member to communicate with a party seeking to hire new counsel or
to obtain a second opinion. A member contacted by such a party
continues to be bound by other Rules of Professional Conduct. (See,
e.g., rules 1-400 and 3-310.) (Amended by order of Supreme Court,
operative September 14, 1992.)
|