| PUBLICATIONS
-- NEW MATTER |
New Matter
the official publication of the Intellectual Property
Section is a journal of current comment and analysis of
cases and issues vital to the use of intellectual property. The
journal is sent free to members of the Intellectual Property
Section. To subscribe you need only join the Section. For editorial contact information, see
the
Executive Committee Roster.
Several issues are now posted in our
Members Only Area.
| TABLE OF
CONTENTS |
|
2009
Issue 1
Volume 34: Issue 1, 2009
2008
Issue 4
Volume 33: Issue 4, 2008
2008
Issue 3
Volume 33: Issue 3, 2008
2008
Issue 2
Volume 33: Issue 2, 2008
2008
Issue 1
Volume 33: Issue 1, 2008
2007
Issue 4
Volume 32: Issue 4, 2007
2007
Issue 3
Volume 32: Issue 3, 2007
2007
Issue 2
Volume 32: Issue 2, 2007
2007
Issue 1
Volume 32: Issue 1, 2007
2006
Issue 4
Volume 31: Issue 4, 2006
2006
Issue 3
Volume 31: Issue 3, 2006
|
2006 Issue
1
Volume 31: Issue 1, 2006
2005 Issue 1 / 2
Volume 30: Issue 1 / 2, 2005
2004
Issue 1
Volume 29: Issue 1, 2004
December 2003
Volume 28, Number 3/4
September
2003
Volume 28, Number 1/2
Summer/Fall
2002
Volume 27, Number 2/3
Spring
2002
Volume 27, Number 1
Fall 2001 / Winter
2002
Volume 26, Number 3
Spring/Summer 2001
Volume 26, Number 1
Winter
2000
Volume 25, Number 3/4
Summer/Fall
2000
Volume 25, Number 2
|
Spring
2000
Volume 25, Number 1
Summer
1999
Volume 24, Number 2
Spring 1999
Volume 24, Number 1
Fall 1998
Volume 23, Number 2
Spring 1998
Volume 23, Number 1
Fall/Winter 1997
Volume 22, Number 3
Spring/Summer 1997
Volume 22, Number 1/2
Winter/Spring 1997
Volume 21, Number 4
Fall 1996
Volume 21, Number 3
Summer 1996
Volume 21, Number 2
|
Issue 1,
2009
Volume 34, Issue 1, 2009
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Don’t Mess With Texas:
Transferring Venue to California
Brandon Baum and Amdrew Holmes
Letter from the Chair
Barbara Friedman
Letter from the Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
Copyright Legislation and American
Textile Competitiveness
Megan E. Gray
Design Patent Enforcement After
Egyptian Goddess
Robert W. Payne
Does the Trademark Dilution Cause of
Action Make a Difference? (Part 1)
Michael A. Grow
If it Ain’t
Broke…
Arturo E. Sandoval
The Perils of Publishing and
Promoting a Memoir with False Claims in California
Thomas A.Ward
Virtual World
Jess M. Collen and Mattew C. Wagner and Oren Gelber
Licensing Forum
Kevin D. Debré
The Moving Picture: Evolving
Media
James D. Nguyen
Current Events
Heather A. Meeker
Counterfeit Corner
Nicole Smith
Ninth Circuit Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Issue 4,
2008
Volume 33, Issue 4, 2008
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Blogging: Benefits, Barriers, and
Bombshells
Jonathan Pink
Letter from the Chair
Barbara Friedman
Letter from the Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
Patent Infringement Issues Raised by
Self-Replicating Inventions
Laurel Kilgour, Deepa Nama and James Fox
IP Asset Management Programs and
In-House Counsel - A Practical Primer
Russell Boltwood
The Unintended Franchise and How to
Avoid It
Tal Grinblat
Analysis of the Five Issues Raised
for Review in In re Bilski
Karen Canaan
Licensing Forum
New BIS Encryption Regulation Contains Good and Bad News for U.S.
Exporters
Kevin D. DeBré and Denise Laird
The Moving Picture: Evolving
Media
James D. Nguyen
Counterfeit Corner
Nicole Smith
Ninth Circuit Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Issue 3,
2008
Volume 33, Issue 3, 2008
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
The Newest IP Threat in China: IP
Hijacking (Part 2 of 2)
Enoch Liang and Andy An
Letter From the Chairs
Joanna R. Mendoza and Barbara Friedman
Intellectual Property Issues in Clean
Technology I: Obtaining Patent Protection for Solar Cell
Manufacturing Processes in View of Recent Developments in Patent
Law
Eric L. Lane
Unauthorized Acts in Declaratory
Judgment
James Juo
The London Agreement as an Add-On to The EPC: Can
Applicants Actually Save Money?
Mark Wegener
Deconstructing the Controversial “Orphan
Works” Copyright Legislation of 2008
Andres Quintana
Much Ado About the Constitutionality
of Administrative Patent Judges
Matthew J. Spark
Recent California Appellate Decision
Highlights Additional Arrow in the Trade Secret Litigator’s
Quiver: Attacking the Independent Economic Value Element of a Trade
Secret Misappropriation Claim
Kurt Karpes, Robert Milligan, Jessica Panika
En Banc Eleventh Circuit Rules that
Publishers’ Rights Extend to CD-ROMs of Back Issues
Free Software Licensing is
Vindicated—By a Patent Court
Heather Meeker
Licensing Forum
Kevin DeBré
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Counterfeit Corner
Nicole Smith
Ninth Circuit Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
NEW TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION JURY
INSTRUCTIONS
Issue 2,
2008
Volume 33, Issue 2, 2008
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Copyright Quake Hits
California
Jonathan Pink and Justin M. Righettini
Letter From the Chair
Joanna R. Mendoza
Elizabeth E. Powers
Letter from the Editor
Use of Patent Law Experts in
California Superior Court
Michael H. Jester
Does the “Hear No Evil, See No
Evil, Speak No Evil” Defense Apply Under the UTSA?
Jill F. Kopeikin
An Overview of the New California
Model Trademark Law
Mary A. Harris and Mark R. Leonard
The Need for a Thorough Pre-Filing
Investigation Prior to Filing Any Patent Litigation
Alan P. Block
The Newest IP Threat in China: IP
Hijacking (Part 1 of 2)
Enoch Liang and Andy An
Licensing Forum
Kevin DeBré
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Ninth Circuit Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
A Town Focused on Change IP Law
Section’s 2008 Delegation to DC
IP Section Set to Host Blockbuster IP
Educational Programs
Issue 1,
2008
Volume 33, Issue 1, 2008
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Multidistrict Litigation Part II:
Selection of a Transfer District and Proceedings After
Transfer
Randall A. Spencer
Letter From the Chair
Joanna R. Mendoza
Letter From the Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
The New EPC 2000: A Real Blessing or
Just a Mess?
Mark Wegener
Simple Creativity—Is It
“Original” Enough for a Copyright?
Katherine L. McDaniel and James Juo
The Admissibility of Indemnity
Evidence in IP Litigation
Benjamin D. Scheibe
Preemption Under California’s
Uniform Trade Secrets Act
Andres Quintana
When Is Extrinsic Evidence Really
“Extrinsic?”
Breton A. Bocchieri
Licensing Forum
David Gurnick
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Practice Notes
Thomas A. Ward
Ninth Circuit Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
IP
Institute Report
Barbara Friedman
IP Section Presents Programs at State
Bar SEI
Randall E. Kay
Issue 4,
2007
Volume 32, Issue 4, 2007
[Posted in the Members Only Area
Obtaining Advice of Counsel after
Seagate
Bernard Chao
Letter From the Chair
Joanna R. Mendoza
Letter From the Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
Beware Foreign Defendants: You May Be
Liable For Patent Infringement Even Without Conducting Any Business
in the United States
James V. Fazio, III and S. Christian Platt
The Current Role for the Patent
Expert and IT’s Boundaries
Laurence H. Pretty
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Licensing Forum
Thomas J. Speiss, III
Ninth Circuit Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Note from the Legislation
Committee
D. Benjamin Borson
Multidistrict Litigation Part I:
Requirements and Procedures for Transfer and Related Jurisdictional
Issues
Randall A. Spencer
Issue 3,
2007
Volume 32, Issue3, 2007
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Patent Reform Act of 2007: A Country
Traveling Forward
J. Tori Evans
Letter From the Chair
Joanna R. Mendoza
Letter From the Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
Supreme Court Decisions in eBay,
Medimmune, and KSR Deliver Triple Dose of Bad News to
Non-Practicing Patent Holders (aka “Patent Trolls”)
Keith Slenkovich
Mentors—The More, The
Merrier
Nan E. Joesten
The Opportunities and Challenges
Presented by the Revitalized Defense of Inequitable Conduct to
Patent Infringement: Thoughts for Patent Litigators and
Prosecutors
Jose L. Patino and James J. Mullen III
Recent California State Court
Decision Strikes Down Broad “No-Hire”
Provision
Robert Mulligan and Jesica Pandika
Turning Lead into Gold: The
Transmutation of Extrinsic Evidence into Intrinsic Evidence Through
Use of Prior Art Statements in Light of KSR and Phillips
Matthew J. Spark
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Licensing Forum
Kevin DeBré
Ninth Circuit Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Note from the Legislation
Committee
D. Benjamin Borson
Issue 2,
2007
Volume 32, Issue2, 2007
[Posted in the Members Only Area
The Software Patent Landscape after
Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp.
Scott Loras Murray and TJ Singh
Letter From the Chair
Sivon Kalminov
Letter From the Editor
JoAnna M.Esty
At Seagate Without a Compass:
“Advice-Of-Counsel” Defense Might Sink Attorney-Client
Privilege
J. Donald McCarthy
Addressing the Post-Grokster Chill
Cast Over Technology Innovation: New Policies and Practices to
Minimize Exposure to Direct and Secondary Liability for
Copyright
Thomas J. Speiss, III and Cary Tope-McKay
Back for a Second Cup: Court of
Appeal Sends Taster’s Choice Case Back for Retrial After
Addressing Important Issues Regarding Right of Publicity Law
Lincoln D. Bandlow
NINTH CIRCUIT REPORT
Neil A. Smith
Annual D.C. Trip Plays a Key Role in
Maintaining Strong Federal Relationships
Joanna R. Mendoza
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Patent Reform and the Prevailing
Party Award: How Cal. Civ. Code § 998 Can Help
Thomas A. Ward
Issue 1,
2007
Volume 32, Issue 1, 2007
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
The Case in Favor of De Novo Review
of Claims Construction by the Federal Circuit
Robert Warren Payne
Letter From the Chair
Sivon Kalvinov
Letter From the Editor
Joanna M. Esty
Open Court Records vs. Trade Secrets:
Reconciling NBC Subsidiary and Rule of Court 243.1
with Civil Procedure Section § 3426.5
Jennifer Brockett
Analysis and Opinion KSR v. Telefl
ex, Inc.: the Supreme Court Reviews Obviousness
D. Benjamin Borson
The Supreme Court Opens the Door to
More Patent Challenges: MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 127 S.
Ct. 764, 166 L. Ed. 2d 604 (2007)
Darren M. Franklin and Neil A. Smith
Licensing Forum - MedImmune, Inc. v.
Genentech, Inc.: What’s All the Fuss?
Kevin D. DeBré
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Ninth Circuit Report: Reno Air Racing
Association, Inc. v. Jerry McCord 452 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir.
2006))
Neil A. Smith
Issue 4,
2006
Volume 31, Issue 4, 2006
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Copyrights in Attorney Work
Product—Panacea or Pandora’s Box?
Greg Victoroff, Esq.
Letter From the Chair
Sivon Kalminov
Letter From the Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
Parody T-Shirts and Trademark Law:
The First Amendment vs. The Right To Profit
Allen B. Grodsky
Analysis and Opinion Concurring
Prejudice — Justice Kennedy, His Ebay Opinion and Certain
Aspects of Patent Law
Joseph Golant
Licensing Forum
Kevin D. DeBré
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Ninth Circuit Report: Quiksilver,
Inc. vs. Kymsta Corporation
Neil A. Smith
Issue 3,
2006
Volume 31, Issue 3, 2006
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Getting the Black Market to Knock It
Off: Strategies to Enforce Trademark Rights in Asia
Matthew A. Powelson
Letter From the Chair
JoAnna M. Esty
Letter From The Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
Protecting Heroes and Superheroes in
the Digital Age—The Battle Between Copyright
“Superpowers” and New Media
Carole E. Handler and James D. Nguyen
Practical Implications for Business
Method Patenting Following Ex parte
Lundgren
David Xue and Michael E. Dergosits
Analysis and Opinion - LabCorp. v.
Metabolite: Legal and Scientific Terminology
D. Benjamin Borson, Ph.D.
Licensing Forum
Kevin D. DeBré
The Moving Picture
James D. Nguyen
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Ninth Circuit Report: Semiconductor
Chip Protection Act Case Reveals Scope of Act and
Enforcement of Internet Software License Agreement
Neil A. Smith
Ninth Circuit Report: Ninth Circuit, Again, Finally Clarifi es
Trademark Doctrine of Aesthetic Functionality
Neil A. Smith
Issue 2,
2006
Volume 31, Issue 2, 2006
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Altera Corp. v. Clear Logic, Inc.:
Revitalization of the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act?
Enoch Wang
Letter From the Chair
JoAnna M. Esty
Letter From the Editor
Elizabeth E. Powers
The History and Recurring Issues of
Ringtones: Lessons for the Future of Mobile Content
Steven Masur
Licensing Forum
Kevin D. DeBré
Proposed Rules for Patent
Practice:Continuations and Claims
D. Benjamin Borson, Ph.D.
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Ninth Circuit Report: Fox v. Dastar
Redux
Neil A. Smith
Supreme Court Report
Neil A. Smith
Issue 1,
2006
Volume 31, Issue 1, 2006
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Circuit Court Decisions Weaken,
Strengthen Hand of Software Owners Using Technological Protection
Measures
Mitchell Zimmerman
Letter From the Chair
JoAnna Esty
Letter From the Editors
Alan P. Block and Barbara J. Quinn
Highly Anticipated Phillips Decision
Unlikely to Bring Predictability to Patent Claim
Construction
Steven R. Hansen
Getting Royalties on a Car By
Reinventing the Wheel
Rick Chang, Kfir Levy, and Nisha Mody
Supreme Court Report:
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.et al. v. Grokster, Ltd., et al.
125 S.Ct. 2764 (2005)
Neil A. Smith
The Evolution and Inevitable Demise
of the Extrinsic-Intrinsic Test for Determining “Substantial
Similarity” in Copyright Cases
Robert W. Denton
A Patent Owner’s Duty to Police
Infringement
Paul Stewart
Awareness of Foreign Filing
Requirements for Inventions Originating Abroad Prevents Adverse
Consequences for Foreign Inventors
Aaron Wininger
Adequate or Inadequate Description
— That’s the Question
By Ying-kit Lau J.D, Ph.D
A Review of Case Law Covering
Step-Plus-Function Claims:Tips for the Patent Practitioner
In H. Kim and Sean O’Neill
Licensing Committee Launches to Build
a New IP Community
Interview with Licensing Committee Co Chair Kevin
DeBré
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Issue 1 / 2,
2005
Volume 30: Issue 1 / 2, 2005
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Departing Employees and
“Abandoned” Research
Robert W. Payne
Letter From the Chair
Rebecca Edelson
Letter From The Editor
Christine Kopitzke
The Obligation of “Reasonable
Inquiry” Prior to Filing a Patent Infringement Claim:
Requirements and Potential Liability
Hope E. Melville
As a Cultural Icon, Barbie
Can’t Control How She Appears In Creative Works
Neil A. Smith
The Impact of Impaxx: Will Customer
Non-solicitation Agreements Survive If The Identity
Of Customers Does Not Constitute A Trade Secret?
Veronica M. Gray
Gaining Insight Into Invalidity and
Facilitating Non-Infringement Through EPO Oppositions
Carl Kukkonen III and Steffen Schmidt
Ninth Circuit and California Case
Report
Neil A. Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Issue 1,
2004
Volume 29: Issue 1, 2004
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Ethical Conflicts For The Patent
Practitioner
Daniel Ovanezian and Suk Lee
Letter From the Chair
Mavis S. Gallenson
Letter From the Editor
Christine L. Kopitzke
Grin & Bear It: Litigating An
Infringement Claim Involving Plush Toys
Allan B. Grodsky
Internet Search Engines’
Display Of Banner Ads Keyed To Searches For Trademarks May Be
Infringement: Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications
Corporation and Excite, Inc. 354 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir.
2004)
Neil Smith
Patent Law Experts: Their Selection
And Role in Patent Litigation
Michael H. Jester
Fair Use And TRIPs: Too Much of a
Good Thing?
Anne Hiaring
Call For Comments!
Ninth Circuit Report -- Supreme Court
Grants Certiorari in Trademark Fair Use Case: KP Permanent Make-Up,
Inc. v. Lasting Impression I Inc., 328 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2003),
Cert. Granted, 124 S.CT. 981 (2004)
Neil Smith
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
December 2003
Volume 28, Number 3/4
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Trademark Dilution Demystified? Mosely v. V Secret
Catalogue, Inc.
Jill A. Jacobs and Carolyn E. Sieve
Letter
From the Chair
Robert W. Payne
Letter
From the Editor
JoAnne S. Redmann, Co-Editor
Saving
the Right of Publicity
Robert M. Shore
The
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Intellectual Property Cases in
View of Daubert and Kumho
Michael A. Jacobs and Richard C. Kim
What is
the U.S. Bar / EPO Liaison Council Doing for You?
Larry Maxham
Short-Circuiting Means-Plus-Function
Restrictiveness
Steven C. Sereboff
Student
Contest WInner --
The Rarely Troublesome Problem: International Conflicts of Law and
the Presumption Against Extraterritorial Application of the
Copyright Act
Taylor Stephen Ball
Case
Comments
Lowell Anderson
Calendar of Upcoming
Events
September 2003
Volume 28, Number 1/2
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Elephants, Donkeys, and Ducks: When Trademarks Are
Borrowed for Political Speech
Mary Ann Novak
Letter
From the Chair
Robert W. Payne
Letter
From the Editor
Christine L. Kopitzke
Mobile
Phone Ring Tones: Digital Technology Once Again Pushes the Envelope
of Copyright Law
Clark Siegel and Tom Werner
Identifying Trade Secrets in Litigation: Managing
the Process
Randy Kay
REPORTS
United
States Supreme Court: Supreme Court Upholds Copyright Term
Extension Act
Tyler T. Ochoa
Ninth
Circuit / Supreme Court: Lanham Act Remedies Not Available for
Failure to Give Attribution
Neil A. Smith
California Supreme Court: The Continuing Development
of Jurisdiction in California Over On-Line Infringers
Neil A. Smith
Case
Comments
Lowell Anderson
State Bar Intellectual
Property Institute Report: 27th Annual Institute
The
Patent Track
Scott R. Hansen
The
Trademark Track
J. Alison Grabell
Mixed
I.P. Track / Day One
Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller
Mixed
I.P. Track / Day Two
Jean K. Murrell-Adams
Summer/Fall 2002
Volume 27, Number 2/3
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Developments Concerning Non-Competes and the
Inevitable Disclosure Rule
By Laurence H.Pretty
Pasadena
Letter
From the Chair
by Katherine L. McDaniel
Los Angeles
Letter
From the Editor
by Scott R. Hansen
Newport Beach
Personal Information Privacy: Obsolete in Today's
World
By Judy L. Ford
Sacramento
Asserting Claims for Statutory and Common Law Unfair
Competition: The Limitations Imposed on Civil Litigants
By David Dolkas
Palo Alto
Doctrine of Equivalents in Light of the Supreme
Court's Decision in Festo v. SMC, J&J v. RES and Symbol
Technologies v. Lemelson
By D.Benjamin Borson
San Francisco
New PTO
Electronic Filing Requirements
By Mary Dougherty
San Francisco
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson & In H. Kim
Laguna Hills
9th
Circuit Report
by Neil A. Smith
San Francisco
Open
Source, Free Software the General Public License: An Overview of
the History and Current Status of One of the Fastest Growing and
Most Misunderstood Methods of Technology Licensing
By Jason B.Wacha
Sunnyvale
Opinion
-- Don't Lose Our Minds: The Need to Protect Academic
Property
By Harvey E.Harrison
Los Angeles
Squeezing the Web Site Host: Whether You Can
Pressure a Web Site Host Into Taking Down an Objectionable Web Site
Depends Upon the Right You Are Assuming
By Joel Voelzke
Los Angeles
Commercial Offers for Sale - Contracts 101
Revisited
By George R.Meyer
Austin, Texas
Spring 2002
Volume 27, Number 1
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
Thou
Shalt Not Steal: A Canon of Construction of Title17?
by David Nimmer
Los Angeles
Extra!
Can't Read All About It: Articles Disappear After High Court Rules
Freelance Writers Taken Out of Context in New York Times Co. v.
Tasini
by Douglas P. Bickham
Student Writing Competition Winner 2002
Letter
Fom the Chair
by Katherine L. McDaniel
Los Angeles
Letter From the
Editor
by Scott R. Hansen
Newport Beach
Are E-Mails Woirth
the Paper They Are Written On? The Interplay of Electronic
Signature Legislation and the Copyright Act's Statute of
Frauds
by Gregory A. Nylen
Santa Monica
Claim It or Lose It:
The Doctrine of Equivalents Takes Another Blow?
by John P. OBanion
Sacramento
The Research Tax
Credit of 26 U.S.C. § 41: A Relevant Model for IP
Practitioners
by Bruce McLaughlin
Roseville
9th Circuit
Report
by Neil A. Smith
San Francisco
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson & In H. Kim
Laguna Hills
Computer Security
for Lawyers and Legal Professionals: Fundamentals of
Encryption
by Barry K. Shelton
San Diego
Ninth Circuit Rules
That Displaying Full-size Images on Web Site Constitutes Violation
of U.S. Copyright Laws
by Steven L. Krongold
Irvine
"Lost in the
Foundry": Transactions Between a Patent Owner and a Manufacturer of
the Product Incorporating the Patented Invention Made for the
Patent Owner for Resale by the Patent Owner Constitutes "On-Sale"
Events Under 35 U.S.C. §102(B)
by William C. Cray
Santa Ana
Record-Setting
Patent Infringement Damages Award in Japan
by John A. Tessensohn
Osaka, Japan
Fall 2001 / Winter 2002
Volume 26, Number 3
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
The
Impact of Festo, Its Progeny and Its Future
by Breton August Bocchieri
Los Angeles
Letter
Fom the Chair
by Katherine L. McDaniel
Los Angeles
Letter From the
Editor
by Scott R. Hansen
Newport Beach
Preparing Patentability Opinions
by Brian M. Berliner
Los Angeles
Trademarks and Internet Hyperlinks, a Policy
Analysis: User Utility, Commercial Revenues Defended by "Qualified
Right to Link"
by Christopher R. Hilberg
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Equivalence" by Any Other Name: Does the AIPA
Provide a Means to Establish "Equivalence" of Amended Claims,
Despite Festo?
by Robert W. Payne, May Lin DeHaan & Miriam Schakat
Monterey
9th
Circuit Report: Surf's Up for California Right of Publicity and
Unfair Competition Law
by Neil A. Smith
San Francisco
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson & In H. Kim
Laguna Hills
Is It
Burnout, Or Am I Just Whining?
by Ruth Luban, M.A.
Santa Monica
Spring/Summer 2001
Volume 26, Number 1
[Posted in the Members Only Area]
The
Emerging Jurisprudence of Domain Name Dispute Resolution
by Trenton H. Norris, Barbara L. Friedman, and Rebecca Hooley
San Francisco
Letter
from the Chair
by John P. O’Banion
Sacramento
Letter
from the Editor
by Scott R. Hansen
Los Angeles
State
Immunity From Federal Patent and Trademark Laws, Part II
by D. Benjamin Borson, Ph.D.
San Francisco
Starting Points for the First Innovator
Defense
by George R. Meyer
Austin, Texas
The
Experimental Stage Doctrine: The Quiet Death of an Experimental Use
Heresy
by Zi Wong
San Francisco
Inter
Parties Reexamination: The United States Joins Europe and Japan in
Providing an Adversarial Administrative Procedure for Testing
Patent Validity
by M. Patricia Thayer, James A. Fox, Ph.D. & Marvin A.
Motsenbocker, Ph.D.
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson & In H. Kim
Laguna Hills
Ninth
Circuit Report
by Neil A. Smith
San Francisco
Author
Submission Guidelines
Note to
Advertisers
Winter 2000
Volume 25, Number 3/4
Authors Electronic
Rights Under Tasini: A Snapshot Before the Last Round
by Katherine L. McDaniel
Century City
Letter from the
Chair
by John P. O'Banion
Letter from the
Editor
by Michael M. Krieger
Sunrise Over ICANN:
TLD on the Horizon
by Ellen Rony
Tiburon
Intellectual
Property Cases Under "Advertising Injury"/Personal Injury Coverage
and Its Implications for E-Commerce
by David A. Gauntlett
Irvine
Security Starting
Point: Review of Cybershock by Winn Schwartau
bt Robert M. Slade
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Using Summary
Judgment Motions to Reduce the Cost and Duration of Patent
Infringement Actions
by Robert A. Shcroeder
Pasadena
The New California Anti-Cyberpiracy Law
First Take: Festo
Decision Eviscerates Doctrine of Equivalent
by Lowell Anderson
Laguna Hills
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson and In H. Kim
Laguna Hills
Summer/Fall 2000
Volume 25, Number 2
The
Evitable Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine
by Dennis G. Martin and Willmore F. Holbrow, III
Los Angeles
Letter from the
Chair
by John P. O'Banion
Letter from the
Editor
by Michael M. Krieger
State
Immunity From Federal Patent and Trademark Laws
by D. Benjamin Borson, Ph.D.
San Francisco
Intellectual Property Protection Restoration Act
(Proposed)
by Senator Patrick Lealty
United States Senator, Vermont
The
Revolution Will Be Televised: Analysis of the REPLAYTV and TIVO
Personal Video Recorders
by Ryan S. Hilbert
Palo Alto
Will
the Real Inventor Please Stand Up? A Brief Overview of U.S. Patent
Interference
by Richard C. Kim
San Diego
Out
With the Herd Instince, in With Antitrust: California's New
Definition of Unfair Competition
by J. Daniel Holsenback
San Diego
Ninth
Circuit Report
by Neil A. Smith
San Francisco
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson
Laguna Hills
Spring 2000
Volume 25, Number 1
INTERNATIONAL FOCUS ISSUE
Introduction by Michael M. Krieger, Editor
Ninth
Circuit Report
by Neil A. Smith
San Francisco
The
Future of WIPO
by Dr. Kamil Idris
Geneva, Switzerland
Letter
from the Chair
by Carol Smith
San Francisco
Time
and Space
by David Nimmer
Los Angeles
Foreign
Domain Name Disputes
by Diane Cabell, Esq.
Boston, Massachusetts
The
Role of Foreign Judgments in Patent Litigation: A Perspective and
Strategic Overview
by Phillip L. McGarrigle
Santa Clara
International Patent Pitfalls for U.S. Applicants,
Especially Before the European Patent Office
by Alexander R. Schlee
Muenchen, Germany
Avery
Dennison Revisited The Courts vs. the ICANN Uniform Dispute
Resolution Policy
by M. Scott Donahey
Palo Alto
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson
Laguna Hills
Summer 1999
Volume 24, Number 2
In
Search of Uniformity State Marital Property Laws and the
Balkanization of Federal Copyright Ownership: Why Congress Must Act
Now to Ensure a Nationwide Standard
by Edward Randall Bernett
Seaside
Letter
from the Chair
by Gerry Sekimura
San Francisco
Business Methods Without Computers: The New Patent
Landscape
by Victor Flores
Monterey
Avoiding Trade Secret Problems When
Hiring
by Jennifer L. Blackman, Esq. and M. Patricia Thayer, Esq.
San Francisco
Putting
Persuasion to Work in Highly Technical Cases: A Jury-Centered
Approach
by Howard Varinsky
Emeryville
The
Federal Circuit Clarifies that Useful Software-Related Inventions
Can Constitute Patentable Processes
by Michael Joel Shallop
San Jose
Integrating Electronic Aids INTO Intellectual
Property Trials
by Carl A. Kukkonen, III
Los Angeles
Case
Comments
by Lowell Anderson
Newport Beach
Supreme
Court Reverses the Federal Circuit's Clearly Erroneous Standard for
Reviewing Factfinding by the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences
by Neil A. Smith and Seong-Kun Oh
San Francisco
Spring 1999
Volume 24, Number 1
On-Sale
Bar Determinations: The Aftermath of Pfaff v. Wells
Electronics
By John P. O'Banion
San Francisco
Letter from the
Chair
by Gerry Sekimura
San Francisco
The Federal
Trademark Dilution Act, Product Configurations and the Patent
Clause: An Unresolvable Conflict?
By Ivan Rothman
San Francisco
Using the United
States Customs Service to Stop Infringement of U.S. Intellectual
Property Rights
By John Eichorst, San Francisco and William C. Rooklidge, Newport
Beach
A Primer
Emerging Trends in Liability for Trademark Infringement on the
Internet
By Edward G. Poplawski and Janene P. Bassett
Los Angeles
Trade Secrets:
Employer/Employee Restrictive Covenants May Find New Life Outside
Stock Sales
By David R. Shaub
Los Angeles
Preparing Patent
Applications to Resist Erosion by Claim Construction or Denial of
Equivalents Under Current Case Law
By Laurence H. Pretty
Los Angeles
Limiting Claims by
the Specifications in Non-Means + Function Cases: Is a Former CAFC
Trend in Retreat?
By John L. Rogitz
San Diego
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Newport Beach
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil Smith
San Francisco
Fall 1998
Volume 23, Number 2
Scope of Protective
OrdersWhat Do You Do When You Represent a Client in Both
Patent Litigation and Prosecution Matters?
By Kyla Harriel
San Francisco
Letter From the
Chair
by Gerry Sekimura
San Francisco
The Internet and
Personal Jurisdiction
By Cherie G. Porter and Bob Pimm
Boyes Hot Springs, California
In Re Zurko: The
Federal Circuit Clears the Way for the Clearly Erroneous Standard
in Reviewing Patent and Trademark Office's Decisions
By Neil A. Smith and Seong-Kun Oh
San Francisco
Stare Un-decisis:
The Sometimes Rough Treatment of Precedent in Federal Circuit
Decisionmaking
By Matthew F. Weil and William C. Rooklidge
Newport Beach
Issues Relating to
the Patentability of Expressed Sequence Tags
By James Fox, Ph.D.
Palo Alto
Inevitable
Disclosure: Too Much Fuss Over an Old Doctrine
By James Pooley
Palo Alto
Patenting Financial
Products and Services
By Joseph G. Swan
Los Angeles
Personal
Jurisdiction in Declaratory Judgment Cases in Light of Red Wing and
Meade
By Bas de Blank, Kristin SNyder and Peter Kang
San Jose
Maximizing the Value
of Your Company's U.S. Patent Portfolio
By Steven E. Shapiro
Los Angeles
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Newport Beach
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil Smith
San Francisco
Spring
1998
Volume 23, Number 1
After
Quality King v. L'Anza: Can a Copyright Owner Still Restrict
Unauthorized Importation of Copyrighted Articles Manufactured
Abroad?
By George M. Borkowski and Robert C. Welsh
Los Angeles
Letter from the
Chair
by F. David LaRiviere
Monterey
Divisional Patent
Applications After June 7, 1995: What Is the Term?
By Karl Stauss
Vista
"Drawings Practice"
in the Prosecution of Trademark Applications
By Jonathan Hudis and Kathleen Cooney-Porter
Arlington, Virginia
Internet Resources
for Patent Law
By Laurie J. Mintz
San Francisco
Defectors Beware:
The "Inevitable Disclosure" Doctrine in California
By Richard L. Stone and David A. Urban
Los Angeles
Patent Infringement
as "Sale Within the United States"
By Megan E. Gray and Jamie Isbester
Los Angeles
Recent Supreme Court
Decision a Stinging Loss for the Entertainment Industry
By Danielle L. Gilmore
Los Angeles
The Effective
Presentation of Expert Evidence in Intellectual Property
Litigation: Observations from the Trial of Fredric Goldman v. O.J.
Simpson
By Thomas P. Lambert
Los Angeles
Current Trends in
Product Configuration Trade Dress CasesA Roadmap to the
Circuit Courts
By Alan P. Block and Jan P. Weir
Los Angeles
Trademarks v. Domain
Names: NSI's Dispute Policy and Other News
By Michael M. Krieger
Los Angeles
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil A. Smith
San Francisco
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Newport Beach
Fall/Winter 1997
Volume 22, Number 3
Letter from the
Chair
By F. David LaRiviere
LaRiviere, Grubman & Payne
Monterey
Litigating
Cross-Border Infringement in International Intellectual Property:
Some Practice Tips and Caveats
By Paul Edward Geller
Los Angeles
Another Factual
Compilation Bites the Dust Under the Copyright Laws: Warren
Publicing, Inc. v. Microdos Data
By Rebecca "Bec" Edelson
Alschuler Grossman & Pines LLP
Los Angeles
The Background Comes
to the Fore
By David Goldberg and Robert J. Bernstein
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
New York, New York
The Untold Story of
Edison's Patent Files
By Hon. James T. Carmichael
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Arlington, Virginia
Image Technical
Services Inc. v. Eastman Kodak C. -- The Antitrust Implications of
"Legal Monopolies"
By Carole E. Handler and Julian Brew
Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler
Los Angeles
Localizing Global
Copyright Infringement: Do International Internet Sound Recording
Infringements Implicate U.S. Copyright Law?
By Marc E. Mayer
Mitchell, Silberberg and Knupp LLP
Los Angeles
Rico Claims for
Patent Fraud -- Another Sledgehammer in Your Quiver
By Cameron C. Powell
Foley & Lardner
Washington, D.C.
So, You're Thinking
of Leaving Your Law Firm? The Ethics and Law of Preemptive
Strikes
By Robert W. Payne
LaRiviere, Grubman & Payne
Monterey
Oddzon Products Inc.
v. Just Toys Inc.: Practitioner Beward: Prior Knowledge Requirement
of 35 U.S.C. Section 102(F) Clarified
By Philip L. McGarrigle
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation
Pleasanton
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil A. Smith
Limbach & Limbach, L.L.P.
San Francisco
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear
Newport Beach
Spring/Summer 1997
Volume 22, Number 1/2
Letter from the
Chair
By M. Patricia Thayer
Howard Rice Nemerovski et al.
San Francisco
Sui Generis Database
Protection: Is It Really Necessary?
By Jonathan Band and Jonathan S. Gowdy
Morrison & Foerster
Washington, D.C.
Co-Ownership of
Copyright and Fiduciary Duty: The Poverty of Preemption
By Rafael Chodos
Law Offices of Rafael Chodos
Santa Monica
Give Notice and Know
Duty-to-Defend Basics Under Buss
By Pascal W. Di Fronzo
Ross, Dixon & Masback L.L.P.
Irvine
Patent Law Post
Markman/Hilton Davis: A Gaze into a Fractured Crystal
Ball
By Jacques M. Dulin
Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe
Palo Alto
Plant
Patents--R.I.P.: A Critique of Imazio v. Dania Greenhouses, 36
U.S.P.Q. 2D 1673 (Fed.Cir.1995)
By Vincent G. Gioia
Christie, Parker & Hale L.L.P.
Pasadena
Interim Relief in
International Intellectual Property Arbitration
By Richard Allan Horning
Tomlinson Zisko Morosoli & Maser L.L.P.
Palo Alto
The Internet and the
Mortal Death of a Bad Statute
By Robert Spanner
Trial & Technology Group
Menlo Park
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil A. Smith
Limbach & Limbach L.L.P.
San Francisco
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear
Newport Beach
Winter/Spring 1997
Volume 21, Number 4
Letter from the
Chair
By M. Patricia Thayer
Howard Rice Nemerovski et al.
San Francisco
The Doctrine of
Equivalents: The Supreme Court Finally Rules--Almost...
Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
By Neil A. Smith and Seong-Kun Oh
Limbach & Limbach LLP
San Francisco
An Alternative View:
The Hilton Davis Decision
By Stephen S. Korniczky and Robert C. Laurenson
Lyon & Lyon, LLP
La Jolla
Litigating
Preliminary Injunctions in Patent Cases
By Laurence H. Pretty and Jeffrey A. Finn
Pretty, Schroeder & Poplawski
Los Angeles
The Expanding Right
of Publicity
By Joseph von Sauers
Loeb & Loeb
Century City
Claim Amendments
Under the European Patent Convention
By Dr. Hermann Diehl and Dr. Thomas Leiderscher
Diehl, Glaeser, Hiltl & Partner
Munich, Germany
Attorney's Fees
After Fogerty: Ninth Circuit Leaves Muddy Trail for Copyright
Practitioners
By Robert F. Helfing
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold
Los Angeles
Is Contract
Preemption Dead? Contracts and Copyright After ProCD v.
Zeidenberg
By Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
New York, New York
The Princeton
University Press Case: Whose Use?
By Janet A. Kobrin
Small Larkin & Kidde
Los Angeles
Probability Analysis
in Determining Likelihood of Confusion
By Richard E. Backus
Flehr Hohbach Test Albritton & Herbert LLP
San Francisco
GATT/TRIPs, Offers
for Sale, and Interpretive Problems
By Sarah Barone Schwartz
Fliesler, Dubb, Meyer & Lovejoy LLP
San Francisco
Authenticity of
Works on the Internet
By Thomas Heide
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, England
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil A. Smith
Limbach & Limbach LLP
San Francisco
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear
Newport Beach
Fall
1996
Volume 21, Number 3
Letter from the
Chair
By M. Patricia Thayer
Howard Rice Nemerovski et al.
San Francisco
Developments in
Patent Law -- 1996
By Donald S. Chisum, Professor of Law
Santa Clara University
Santa Clara
Developments in
Trademark Law -- 1996
By J. Thomas McCarthy
Professor of Law, University of San Francisco
Of Councsel, Limbach and Limbach
San Francisco
Developments in
Copyright Law -- 1996
By James C. Chapman
Silicon Valley Law Group
San Jose
Life After the Dell
v. FTC Decision
By Erwin J. Basinski
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Mountain View
The Internet and
Personal Jurisdiction
By Cherie G. Porter
Berman, Berkley and Lasky, L.L.P.
San Francisco
Limits on "Medical
Procedures" Patents
By Craig P. Opperman
Cooley Godward L.L.P.
Palo Alto
Groundhog
007
By David Nimmer
Irell & Manella, L.L.P.
Los Angeles
That's Not Funny:
The Limitations on Parody as a Defense to Copyright Infringement in
International Forums
By David Goldberg and Denise L. Bricker
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
New York, New York
The Economic
Espionage Act of 1996
By James Pooley
Fish & Richardson, P.C.
Menlo Park
Claim Drafting for
Literal Infringement
By Stephen A. Becker
Lowe, Price, LeBlanc & Becker
Alexandria, Virginia
Fifth Circuit Adopts
Copyright Misuse Defense and Suggests that Tying Hardware to
Software Constitutes Misuse
By Flavio Rose
Irell & Manella, L.L.P.
Los Angeles
Inequitable Conduct
Insufficient for Crime Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client
Privilege in Patent Cases
By Todd Burlingame & W. George Wailes
Carr, McClellan, Intersoll, Thompson & Horn
Burlingame
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil A. Smith
Limbach & Limbach L.L.P.
San Francisco
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear
Newport Beach
Summer 1996
Volume 21, Number 2
Letter from the
Chair
By Michael A. Glenn
Menlo Park
Intellectual
Property Due Diligence in Acquisitions of Technology
Companies
By Diane Wilkins Savage
Cooley, Godward, Castro, Huddleson & Tatum
Palo Alto
California Senate
Bill 1533 (Title & Unauthorized Use of a Trademark)
Setting forth the position of the Executive Committee of the
Intellectual Property Section
"Texas Instruments v. Cypress
Semiconductor Corp.," Particularized Testimony and Linking Argument
as to the 'Insubstantiality of the Differences' Is Required to
Prove Doctrine of Equivalents Infringement
By Edward P. Heller III
Seagate Technology, Inc.
Scott Valley
Laches and Estoppel:
An Effective Defense Weapon for Summary Judgment
By Stephen E. Blaine and Graig R. Woodburn
Callahan, Blaine & Williams
Irvine
Alternative Dispute
Resolution (ADR) for Intellectual Property Counsel
By R. Michael Kennedy, Jr., Esq.
TYCO TOYS, INC.
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey
A Bill of Electronic Rights for Creators and
Copyright Holders
By Lesley Ellen Harris
Toronto, Canada
Strategic Patent
Counseling
By Peter R. Leal
Cooley, Godward, Castro, Huddleson & Tatum
Palo Alto
A User-Friendly
Guide to California's Legislature on the Internet
By Larry Doyle, Chief Legislative Counsel
The State Bar of California
Sacramento
Is "Detent
Mechanism" the Same as "Detent Means"? The Federal Circuit Rules on
Whether a Mechanism Defined in Functional Terms Is Interpreted
Under 35 U.S.C. Section 112 Paragraph 6
By Lee Van Pelt
Hickman, Beyer and Weaver
Palo Alto
Advising Your
Multimedia Client...Multimedia Content Licensing and Live-Action
Production
By Carol T. Contes, Esq.
The American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
(AFTRA)
Hollywood
Cyberspace Law: Free
Speech and the Internet
By Robert Alan Spanner
Trial & Technology Group
When Words Collide:
Trademarks vs. Domain Names (Part I)
By Michael M. Krieger
Ninth Circuit
Report
By Neil A. Smith
Limbach & Limbach L.L.P.
San Francisco
Case
Comments
By Lowell Anderson
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear
Newport Beach
|