The State Bar of California
  • Log in
  • News
  • Forms
  • Contact
About Us:
  • Our Mission
  • |
  • Who We Are
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • Careers
  • |
  • Business Opportunities
  • Public
    • Need Legal Help
      • Look Up a Lawyer
      • Certified Lawyer Referral Services Directory
        • Why Use a Certified Lawyer Referral Service
      • Free Legal Help
    • Complaints & Claims
      • How to File a Complaint
        • Before You File
        • Why File a Complaint
        • Attorney Complaint
        • After You File
        • Después de presentar una queja
        • Nonattorney Complaint
        • Discipline Referral
      • Unauthorized Practice of Law Complaint
        • After You File
        • Después de presentar una queja por práctica no autorizada
      • Fee Disputes
        • FAQ
      • Client Security Fund
        • What Happens After You Apply
        • Application Instructions and Checklist
      • Complaint Review Process
      • Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
        • Certified Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
        • Uncertified Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
      • Whistleblower Complaints
      • FAQ
    • Free Legal Information
      • Before Selecting an Attorney
        • Finding the Right Lawyer
        • What a Certified Lawyer Referral Service Can Do for You
        • Your Initial Consultation
      • Working with an Attorney
        • What to Expect from Your Attorney
        • How to Work with Your Lawyer
        • What to Expect Regarding Fees and Billing
        • How to Avoid Problems
      • Resolving Problems
        • Problem with a Lawyer
        • Lawyer Fee Dispute
          • Lawyer Fee Dispute FAQ
        • Client Security Fund
        • When a Lawyer Dies
      • Unauthorized Practice of Law
        • Avoiding Fraud by Immigration Consultants
        • Práctica no autorizada de la abogacía
        • Evite el fraude por parte de los consultores de inmigración
      • For Immigrants
        • Buscando ayuda con asuntos de inmigración
        • Immigration Legal Services Providers
        • Proveedores de servicios legales de inmigración
      • Legal Help After a Disaster
      • For Veterans & Service Members
      • Legal Services Fraud Alert for Homeowners
        • Alerta a Propietarios Referente al Fraude de Servicios Legales
      • Legal Services Fraud Alert for Renters
        • Alerta a Arrendatarios Referente al Fraude de Servicios Legales
      • Legal Guide Pamphlets
      • FAQ
    • Discipline
      • Attorney Discipline
      • Nonattorney Actions
      • Discipline Statistics
      • Look Up a Lawyer
    • Public Trust Liaison
      • Intermediario de Confianza Pública
    • En español
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
      • Protecting the Public
        • Regulation and Discipline Overview
        • Transparency & Accountability
        • Public Comment
          • Public Comment Guidelines
          • Public Comment Archives
            • 2024 Public Comment
            • 2023 Public Comment
            • 2022 Public Comment
            • 2021 Public Comment
            • 2020 Public Comment
            • 2019 Public Comment
            • 2018 Public Comment
            • 2017 Public Comment
              • 2017-12
            • 2016 Public Comment
            • 2015 Public Comment
            • 2014 Public Comment
            • 2013 Public Comment
            • 2012 Public Comment
            • 2011 Public Comment
            • 2010 Public Comment
        • Reports
        • Public Records
      • Promoting Justice in California
      • Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
        • DEI Leadership Seal Program
          • DEI Leadership Seal Recipients
          • DEI Leadership Seal Committed Participants
          • State Bar DEI Leadership Seal Progress
    • Who We Are
      • Board of Trustees
        • Roster
          • Brandon Stallings
          • José Cisneros
          • Raymond A. Buenaventura
          • Hailyn J. Chen
          • Sarah A. Good
          • Mary Huser
          • Melanie M. Shelby
          • Arnold Sowell Jr.
          • Mark W. Toney, PhD
          • Genaro Trejo
        • Meetings
        • Audit Committee
          • Roster
        • Executive Committee
          • Roster
        • Finance Committee
          • Roster
        • Regulation and Discipline Committee
          • Roster
        • Public Comment Guidelines
        • Remote Participation Tips
        • Supreme Court Appointments
        • Board Task Forces
      • Committees
        • Meetings
        • Committee Appointment Opportunities
          • Review Committee-Commission Judicial Nominees Evaluation
            • Roster
        • California Board of Legal Specialization
          • Privacy Law Group
        • Client Security Fund Commission
          • Roster
        • Committee of Bar Examiners
          • Committee of State Bar Accredited and Registered Schools
            • Roster
          • Law School Council
            • Roster
        • Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct
        • Council on Access and Fairness
          • Roster
        • Judicial Nominees Evaluation
          • Review Committee of the Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation
          • Roster
          • FAQ
          • JNE Demographics Reports
        • Lawyer Assistance Program Oversight Committee
          • Roster
        • Legal Services Trust Fund Commission
          • Roster
      • Archived Committees
        • Ad Hoc Commission on the Discipline System
        • Blue Ribbon Commission
          • Resources
          • Roster
        • California Access to Justice Commission
          • Commission Roster
        • California Attorney Practice Analysis Working Group
        • California Paraprofessional Program Working Group
        • Closing the Justice Gap Working Group
        • Committee on Special Discipline Case Audit
        • Governance in the Public Interest Task Force
        • Limited License Working Group
        • Malpractice Insurance Working Group
        • Moral Character Working Group
        • Rules Commission 2017
        • Task Force on Access Through Innovation of Legal Services
      • Staff
      • State Bar Holidays
    • News
      • Fact Sheets
      • Reports
      • Multimedia
      • California Bar Journal Archive
    • Careers
      • Make a Difference
      • Develop and Grow
      • Benefits
      • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
      • View All Job Listings
      • Salary
    • Business Opportunities
      • Previous Opportunities
  • Attorneys
    • Compliance & Records
      • About Your State Bar Profile
        • Fees & Payment
          • Agency Billing
          • Annual Fees FAQs
          • Voluntary Contributions
          • Fees and Charges
        • Status Changes
        • Address Change
        • Reporting Requirements
        • Certificates of Standing
      • Fingerprinting Rule Requirements
        • For In-State Attorneys
        • For Out-of-State Attorneys
        • For Out-of-Country Attorneys
        • FAQ
        • Limited Accommodations
        • Glossary
      • Lawyer Assistance Program
        • LAP Support Services for Attorneys
          • LAP Resources for Attorneys
        • LAP Support Services for Law Students and Applicants
          • LAP Resources for Students
        • Monitored LAP
        • LAP FAQ
      • Mandatory Fee Arbitration
        • Approved Programs
        • Forms & Resources
        • Arbitration Advisories
        • Training Course
      • Opening and Managing Law Office
        • Insurance Programs
        • Limited Liability Partnerships
          • Forms
          • Rules
        • Law Corporations Program
          • Forms
          • Rules
        • Revoking Law Corporation
        • Successor Lawyer Duties When a Lawyer Dies
      • For Judges
      • FAQ
    • MCLE & CLE
      • Requirements
        • Types of MCLE Credit
        • Proportional Requirement
        • MCLE Recordkeeping
        • Attorney Exemptions
        • Attorney Exemptions FAQ
        • Approved Jurisdictions
        • Education Approval
          • Evaluate Credit
          • MCLE Credit Request
        • New Admittees
        • Inactive or Not Eligible Status
        • Out-of-State Residents
        • Good Cause Modification
      • Compliance
        • Who Must Report Compliance
        • Compliance Groups
        • Audit FAQ
      • New Attorney Training Program
      • E-Learning Portal
      • MCLE Providers
        • Single Activity Providers
        • Multiple Activity Providers
        • Provider Responsibilities
        • MCLE Activity Approval
        • Provider Search
        • ADA
      • MCLE Self-Study
        • MCLE Self-Study FAQs
      • CLE
        • CLE Self-Study
      • Rules
        • Rules Specific MCLE Credits
      • FAQ
    • Conduct & Discipline
      • Lawyer Regulation
      • Self-Reporting FAQ
      • State Bar Court
      • Client Trust Accounting & IOLTA
        • Client Trust Accounting Handbook
        • Client Trust Accounting Resources
        • Client Trust Account Protection Program
        • Client Trust Accounts and Bank Stability Concerns
        • CTAPP FAQ
        • CTAPP Training
        • Client Trust Account and IOLTA Registration
        • IOLTA Guidelines for Attorneys
        • IOLTA FAQ
        • IOLTA-Eligible Banks
        • Interest Rates
      • Rules
        • Rules of the State Bar
          • Title 1 Global Provisions
          • Title 2 Rights and Responsibilities of Licensees
          • Title 3 Programs and Services
          • Title 4 Admissions and Educational Standards
          • Title 5 Discipline
          • Title 6 Governance
          • Title 7 JNE and Miscellaneous
          • Appendixes
          • New and Amended Rules
        • Rules of Professional Conduct
          • Current Rules
            • Chapter 1. Lawyer-Client Relationship
            • Chapter 2. Counselor
            • Chapter 3. Advocate
            • Chapter 4. Transactions with Persons Other than Clients
            • Chapter 5. Law Firms and Associations
            • Chapter 6. Public Service
            • Chapter 7. Information About Legal Services
            • Chapter 8. Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession
          • Previous Rules
        • Selected Legal Authority
          • Constitution Excerpts
          • The State Bar Act
          • California Rules of Court
          • Statutes
      • Ethics
        • Hotline
        • Rule 8.3 Required Reporting
        • Opinions
          • 2009-176 to Present
          • 1998-152 to 2008-175
          • 1992-126 to 1997-151
          • 1988-96 to 1991-125
          • 1984-76 to 1987-95
          • 1979-48 to 1983-75
          • 1971-24 to 1977-47
          • 1965-1 to 1970-23
        • Rules Spotlight Videos
        • Ethics Schools
          • Class Schedule
          • Ethics School FAQ
        • Ethics & Technology Resources
          • Ethics Opinions Related to Technology
          • Ethics Articles on Technology
          • Online Participatory MCLE Programs
          • Online Communication
          • Electronic Files
          • Law Firm Websites
          • Social Media
          • Internet/Email Scams
          • Miscellaneous
        • Senior Lawyers Resources
          • Rules
          • Opinions
          • Publications
            • Wellness Guide
          • Articles
          • MCLE
          • Links
          • Closing a Law Practice
          • Contact Us
          • Attorney Surrogacy
        • ADA Claims Information
        • Judicial Ethics
        • Publications
          • Ethics News
          • Ethics News Archive
          • Hotliner Articles
            • Archives
          • Pub 250
          • Compendium on Professional Responsibility Index
        • Attorney Civility and Professionalism
        • Committees
          • COPRAC
            • Education
              • Ethics Symposium
            • Opinion Requests
            • Rules
            • Roster
          • Rules Revision
            • Rules Commission 2014
              • Action Summaries
              • Meetings
              • Roster
    • Ethics
    • Legal Specialization
      • About Certified Specialization
      • Becoming a Certified Specialist
        • Exam Information
          • Exam Preparation Information
          • Laptop Computers
          • Testing Accommodations
          • Refund of Fees Policy
      • Current Certified Specialists
      • Legal Specialty Areas
      • Specialist Search
      • MCLE Requirements for Certified Specialists
      • Education Providers
      • Governance
        • Board of Legal Specialization
          • Roster
        • Privacy Law Group
      • FAQ
      • Rules & Standards
        • Advertising
    • Volunteer
      • Special Master
        • FAQ
        • Rules
        • List
  • Admissions
    • Requirements
      • Registration
      • Education
        • Pre-Legal Education
          • College Equivalency Education
        • Legal Education
          • Fixed Facility
          • Correspondence or Distance Learning
          • Law Office or Judge's Chamber
            • Applying to the LOS Program
            • Additional LOS Program Requirements
          • Foreign Education
          • Foreign Law Degree
      • Social Security Exemption
      • Attorney Applicants
      • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Examinations
      • Dates and Deadlines
      • California Bar Examination
        • Feb 2024 California Bar Exam
        • Testing Centers
        • Laptops for Bar Exam
        • Bar Exam Emails
          • Safelisting Tips for Email
        • Instructions for Essay Questions and Performance Test
        • Hotel Information
        • California Bar Examination Scope
        • Exam Results
          • Bar Exam Pass List
        • Past Exams
        • Grading
        • Scaling
        • Refund of Fees Policy
        • Virtual Oath Packet
        • Attorney's Oath
      • First-Year Law Students' Examination
        • October 2023 First-Year Exam
        • October 2023 First-Year Exam FAQs
        • Admittance Bulletin
        • Exam Results
        • First-Year Exam Grading and Scope
      • Exam Administration
        • Becoming a Grader
        • Becoming a Proctor
      • Exam Statistics
      • Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
      • Testing Accommodations
        • Requesting Testing Accommodations
        • Types of Accommodations and Approvals
        • Appealing Testing Accommodation Decisions
        • Exam Environment and Allowable Items
      • Lawyer Assistance Program Support Services for Law Students and Applicants
    • Moral Character
      • Moral Character Statement
      • Governing Law
      • Submitting an Application
      • Factors and Conduct
      • Guidelines
    • Special Admissions
      • Multijurisdictional Practice (MJP) Program
        • MJP Program Requirements and Process
        • MJP Program Types
      • Pro Hac Vice
      • Out-of-State Attorney Arbitration Counsel (OSAAC)
      • Foreign Legal Consultants (FLC)
        • FAQ
        • Foreign Legal Consultants List
      • Practical Training of Law Students
      • Provisionally Licensed Lawyers
        • Search
    • Law School Regulation
      • Law Schools
      • Committee of Bar Examiners Meetings
        • Minutes
        • Minutes Archive
        • Roster
  • Access to Justice
    • Initiatives
      • California Justice Gap Study
        • Justice Gap Study Survey Data
        • California Law Student Survey Data
      • Publications
      • Leadership Banks
    • Pro Bono
      • Pro Bono Directory
        • Central Coast Area
        • Central Valley Area
        • Los Angeles Area
        • Sacramento and Northern California
        • San Diego and Imperial Valley
        • San Francisco Area
        • Statewide
      • Pro Bono Practice Program
      • Volunteer After a Disaster
      • Volunteer Opportunities to Assist Veterans and Service Members
      • FAQ
    • Grants
      • Legal Aid Funding
      • Justice Gap Fund
      • 2024 Grant Recipients
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Lawyer Referral Services
    • Financial Institutions
      • IOLTA-Eligible Financial Institutions
  • 2017 Public Comment
Seal of The State Bar of California The State Bar of California

Proposed Adjustments to Law School Fees

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Share with Email

The State Bar seeks public comment on proposed adjustments to law school fees.

Deadline: Aug. 18, 2017

NOTE: Publication for public comment is not, and shall not, be construed as a recommendation or approval by the Board of Trustees of the materials published

Subject

Proposed Adjustments to Law School Fees

Background

The Committee of Bar Examiners currently regulates 39 law schools in California:17 California-accredited law schools (CALS) and 22 unaccredited law schools, which includes fixed-facility, distance-learning and correspondence law schools.In addition, there are 21 law schools in California approved by the American Bar Association that are deemed accredited for purposes of qualifying applicants for admission to practice law in California, which the Committee does not regulate.

The current law school regulation fees vary by type (accredited or unaccredited) and student enrollment, but can largely be lumped into two main recurring categories: compliance and inspection.

Compliance fees are paid annually in November at the time the schools file their annual reports.The periodic inspection fees are paid every five years, based on the inspection schedule. There is a distinction between the unaccredited schools and the CALS in terms of the payment structure for inspection fees: unaccredited schools are charged a flat rate based on their student enrollment size, while the CALS are billed a fee at an hourly rate based on the total staff resources expended during the inspection and subsequent report drafting. Both the CALS and the unaccredited law schools pay for travel-related and meal expenses incurred during an inspection.

Discussion/Proposal

The current law school regulation process involves the following primary components:

  • Processing of applications for the registration of new law schools or the accreditation of unaccredited law schools;
  • Annual compliance reporting of accredited and unaccredited law schools;
  • Inspecting schools every five years to confirm the operational compliance of accredited and unaccredited law schools;
  • Enforcing compliance through issuance of Notices of Noncompliance, subsequent inspections and, if needed, Committee hearing and action;
  • Reviewing and recommending Committee action regarding requests for variances, waivers of requirements and major changes by accredited and unaccredited law schools;
  • Drafting recommended changes to Committee’s accreditation or registration standards; and
  • Assisting the Committee in the adoption and implementation of associated changes.

For many years, the revenue received from the law school regulation program has not covered the cost of administering the program.While this has been true for some time, there have been efforts over the years to increase the program fees over time to close the gap.Law School fees in all categories were increased by 10 percent in 2015, and another 5 percent in 2016.

The State Bar’s Office of Research and Institutional Accountability (ORIA) recently completed an analysis of the program revenue and costs and prepared a proposal for increasing the fees associated with the program, which was considered by the Committee during its June 2017 meeting.The agenda item and attachments can be found online at:

http://apps.calbar.ca.gov/cbe/Agenda.aspx?id=10035&tid=0&show=100001472#10001098

In addition to analyzing program revenue and costs, the processes and fees assessed by other accrediting bodies, specifically the American Bar Association’s (ABA) and the Western Association of Schools and Colleges Senior Colleges and University Commission (WASC), were considered. This study focused on the ongoing annual or cyclical fees assessed once the initial school application process has been completed.The analysis found that the fees charged for the regulation of CALS and unaccredited law schools in California are substantially lower than those of other accrediting bodies.Increasing California State Bar Law School Regulation costs from the annualized minimum of $1,735 to the ABA cost would represent over a 600% increase in costs. Even taking the maximum annualized California State Bar cost and increasing it to the ABA level would represent a 65% increase.

To avoid imposing an unmanageable cost on the smallest law schools, fee increases of 20 percent (inspection) and 25 percent (annual reporting) designed to help reduce but not eliminate the funding shortfall, are recommended at this time.The proposed new fee schedules are provided as Attachment A.

In addition to increasing annual compliance report and hourly fees, modifying the inspection fee payment structure such that both the periodic inspection and annual reporting fees are paid on a flat annual installment basis for all schools, was also considered. Including a portion of the cost of periodic inspection fees along with schools’ annual reporting fees could be beneficial to both the schools and the State Bar for planning and budgeting purposes. Planning for known set fees would eliminate the peaks and valleys of payments for the schools, as they would be paying a portion of the site inspection fees each year in advance, regardless of when their inspection is scheduled.

The proposed CALS inspection fee of $22,200 was derived from a review of the fees charged over the last five-year CALS inspection cycle (historic CALS average of $18,500 plus a 20 percent increase).The inspection flat-fee fee payment model would require the CALS to pay a set inspection fee ($22,200, plus an additional campus fee as appropriate) prorated equally over a 5-year inspection cycle.The size of a school’s enrollment would have no bearing on the cost.An alternative model, called the “true-up” option, would require the CALS to pay the same pre-payment of the inspection fee; the final cost, however, would be determined by the actual number of hours expended during the visit and report-writing process (using the proposed hourly rate of $275 per hour).

Under the true-up approach, each of the CALS would be billed the sum total for the inspection (including travel and meal expenses incurred by the inspection team) once the report of the inspection has been finalized and the received by the Committee.The bill would reflect a credit for all annual installment fees that had been paid at the time of invoicing.

The flat-fee payment model is the easiest to administer for both the schools and the State Bar. It also protects both from fluctuations in costs or resources needed to conduct the Law School Regulation function. However, there is the potential that the adopted fee is too low as compared to the investment needed to regulate some CALS, and too high as compared to the investment needed for others. This risk has the potential to negatively impact both the State Bar and the CALS.

The Committee approved in principle the proposal to increase law school regulation fees, subject to a period of public comment.A decision, however, relative to whether a flat-fee or true-up periodic inspection fee should be approved was deferred pending consideration of public comment.The Committee will consider the public comments received and staff’s final recommendations concerning the proposal during its August 31, 2017 meeting.After approval by the Committee, the recommended revised fee schedules will be forwarded to the Board of Trustees for consideration and adoption during its September 2017 meeting.

If ultimately adopted, the new fee schedules would become effective January 1, 2018, and the annual compliance report and the first periodic inspection fee payment would be due November 2018.

Any Known Fiscal/Personnel Impact

Based on both the increased rates recommended and the partial pre-payment of future-years’ inspections, a revenue increase of $92,170 to the Admissions Fund could be realized in 2018.

The impact on the CALS and unaccredited schools is difficult to gauge. While the proposed fees for the majority of schools represent less than two percent of the average posted tuition per student, a few of the very small schools might not be able to sustain any increases, based on their current enrollment base.

Attachment

  • Proposed Revisions to Law School Fee Schedules (redline)

Source

Committee of Bar Examiners

Deadline for Comments

Aug. 18, 2017

Direct Comments to

Deanna Chinn
The State Bar of California
180 Howard St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
415-538-2548
415-538-2304 (Fax)
Deanna.Chinn@calbar.ca.gov

 

Bar Seal
Protecting the public & enhancing the administration of justice.
  • Public
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Admissions
  • Access to Justice
  • Forms
  • Careers
  • Retirees
  • Staff Log in
  • San Francisco (Main Office)
    180 Howard St.
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    415-538-2000
  • Los Angeles
    845 S. Figueroa St.
    Los Angeles, CA 90017
    213-765-1000
Copyright © 2023 The State Bar of California
  • FAQ
  • User Policies
  • Contact
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn