The State Bar of California
  • Log in
  • News
  • Forms
  • Contact
About Us:
  • Our Mission
  • |
  • Who We Are
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • Careers
  • |
  • Business Opportunities
  • Public
    • Need Legal Help
      • Look Up a Lawyer
      • Using a Certified Lawyer Referral Service
        • Certified Lawyer Referral Services Directory
          • LRS FAQs for Consumers
          • File a Complaint about an LRS
          • How to Become a Certified LRS
      • Free Legal Help
    • Complaints & Claims
      • How to File a Complaint
        • Before You File
        • Why File a Complaint
        • Attorney Complaint
        • After You File
        • Después de presentar una queja
        • Nonattorney Complaint
        • Discipline Referral
      • Unauthorized Practice of Law Complaint
        • After You File
        • Después de presentar una queja por práctica no autorizada
      • Fee Disputes
        • FAQ
      • Client Security Fund
        • Client Security Fund Application Process
        • Application Instructions
      • Complaint Review Process
      • Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
        • Certified Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
        • Uncertified Lawyer Referral Service Complaints
      • FAQ
    • Free Legal Information
      • Before Selecting an Attorney
        • Finding the Right Lawyer
        • What a Certified Lawyer Referral Service Can Do for You
        • Your Initial Consultation
      • Working with an Attorney
        • What to Expect from Your Attorney
        • How to Work with Your Lawyer
        • What to Expect Regarding Fees and Billing
        • How to Avoid Problems
      • Resolving Problems
        • Problem with a Lawyer
        • Lawyer Fee Dispute
          • Lawyer Fee Dispute FAQ
        • Client Security Fund
      • Unauthorized Practice of Law
        • Avoiding Fraud by Immigration Consultants
        • Práctica no autorizada de la abogacía
        • Evite el fraude por parte de los consultores de inmigración
      • For Immigrants
        • Buscando ayuda con asuntos de inmigración
        • Immigration Legal Services Providers
        • Proveedores de servicios legales de inmigración
      • Legal Help After a Disaster
      • For Veterans & Service Members
      • Legal Services Fraud Alert for Homeowners
        • Alerta a Propietarios Referente al Fraude de Servicios Legales
      • Legal Services Fraud Alert for Renters
        • Alerta a Arrendatarios Referente al Fraude de Servicios Legales
      • Legal Guide Pamphlets
      • FAQ
    • Discipline
      • Attorney Discipline
      • Nonattorney Actions
      • Discipline Statistics
      • Look Up a Lawyer
    • Public Trust Liaison
      • Intermediario de Confianza Pública
    • En español
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
      • Protecting the Public
        • Regulation Overview
        • Public Comment
          • Public Comment Guidelines
          • Public Comment Archives
            • 2023 Public Comment
            • 2022 Public Comment
            • 2021 Public Comment
            • 2020 Public Comment
            • 2019 Public Comment
            • 2018 Public Comment
            • 2017 Public Comment
              • 2017-12
            • 2016 Public Comment
            • 2015 Public Comment
            • 2014 Public Comment
            • 2013 Public Comment
            • 2012 Public Comment
            • 2011 Public Comment
            • 2010 Public Comment
        • Reports
        • Public Records
      • Promoting Justice in California
      • Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
        • DEI Leadership Seal Program
          • State Bar DEI Leadership Seal Progress
          • DEI Leadership Seal Application
    • Who We Are
      • Board of Trustees
        • Roster
        • Meetings
        • Audit Committee
          • Roster
        • Executive Committee
          • Roster
        • Finance Committee
          • Roster
        • Regulation and Discipline Committee
          • Roster
        • Public Comment Guidelines
        • Remote Participation Tips
        • Supreme Court Appointments
        • Board Task Forces
      • Committees
        • Meetings
        • Blue Ribbon Commission
          • Resources
          • Roster
        • California Board of Legal Specialization
        • Client Security Fund Commission
          • Roster
        • Committee of Bar Examiners
          • Committee of State Bar Accredited and Registered Schools
            • Roster
          • Law School Council
            • Roster
        • Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct
        • Council on Access and Fairness
          • Roster
        • Judicial Nominees Evaluation
          • Review Committee of the Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation
          • Roster
          • FAQ
          • JNE Demographics Reports
        • Lawyer Assistance Program Oversight Committee
          • Roster
        • Legal Services Trust Fund Commission
          • Roster
        • Privacy Law Group
      • Archived Committees
        • Ad Hoc Commission on the Discipline System
        • California Access to Justice Commission
          • Commission Roster
        • California Attorney Practice Analysis Working Group
        • California Paraprofessional Program Working Group
        • Closing the Justice Gap Working Group
        • Committee on Special Discipline Case Audit
        • Governance in the Public Interest Task Force
        • Limited License Working Group
        • Malpractice Insurance Working Group
        • Moral Character Working Group
        • Rules Commission 2017
        • Task Force on Access Through Innovation of Legal Services
      • Staff
      • State Bar Holidays
    • News
      • Fact Sheets
      • Reports
      • Multimedia
      • California Bar Journal Archive
    • Careers
      • Make a Difference
      • Develop and Grow
      • Benefits
      • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
      • View All Job Listings
      • Salary
    • Business Opportunities
      • Previous Opportunities
  • Attorneys
    • For Attorneys
      • About Your State Bar Profile
        • Fees & Payment
          • Agency Billing
          • Annual Fees FAQs
          • Voluntary Contributions
          • Fees and Charges
        • Status Changes
        • Address Change
        • Reporting Requirements
        • Certificate of Standing
      • Fingerprinting Rule Requirements
        • For In-State Attorneys
        • For Out-of-State Attorneys
        • For Out-of-Country Attorneys
          • Out-of-Country Deadline Extension Request
        • Multijurisdictional Practitioner
        • FAQ
        • Penalty Schedule
        • Limited Accommodations
        • Glossary
      • Lawyer Assistance Program
        • Voluntary LAP for Attorneys
        • Voluntary LAP for Law Students and Applicants
        • Monitored LAP
        • LAP Resources
        • LAP FAQ
      • Mandatory Fee Arbitration
        • Approved Programs
        • Forms & Resources
        • Arbitration Advisories
      • Opening and Managing Law Office
        • Insurance Programs
        • Limited Liability Partnerships
          • Forms
          • Rules
        • Law Corporations Program
          • Forms
          • Rules
        • Revoking Law Corporation
      • For Judges
      • FAQ
    • MCLE & CLE
      • Requirements
        • Types of MCLE Credit
        • Proportional Requirement
        • MCLE Recordkeeping
        • Attorney Exemptions
        • Attorney Exemptions FAQ
        • Approved Jurisdictions
        • Education Approval
          • Evaluate Credit
          • MCLE Credit Request
        • New Admittees
        • Inactive or Not Eligible Status
        • Out-of-State Residents
        • Good Cause Modification
      • Compliance
        • Who Must Report Compliance
        • Compliance Groups
        • Audit FAQ
      • New Attorney Training Program
      • E-Learning Portal
      • MCLE Providers
        • Provider Search
        • Single Activity Providers
        • Multiple Activity Providers
        • Provider Record Keeping
        • Qualifying Activities
        • ADA
      • MCLE Self-Study
        • MCLE Self-Study FAQs
      • CLE
        • CLE Self-Study
      • Rules
        • Rules Specific MCLE Credits
      • FAQ
    • Conduct & Discipline
      • Lawyer Regulation
      • Self-Reporting FAQ
      • State Bar Court
      • Client Trust Accounting & IOLTA
        • Client Trust Accounting Handbook
        • Client Trust Accounting Resources
        • Client Trust Account Protection Program
        • Client Trust Accounts and Bank Stability Concerns
        • CTAPP FAQ
        • CTAPP Training
        • Client Trust Account and IOLTA Registration
        • IOLTA Guidelines for Attorneys
        • IOLTA FAQ
        • IOLTA-Eligible Banks
        • Interest Rates
      • Rules
        • Rules of the State Bar
          • Title 1 Global Provisions
          • Title 2 Rights and Responsibilities of Licensees
          • Title 3 Programs and Services
          • Title 4 Admissions and Educational Standards
          • Title 5 Discipline
          • Title 6 Governance
          • Title 7 Miscellaneous
          • Appendixes
          • New and Amended Rules
        • Rules of Professional Conduct
          • Current Rules
            • Chapter 1. Lawyer-Client Relationship
            • Chapter 2. Counselor
            • Chapter 3. Advocate
            • Chapter 4. Transactions with Persons Other than Clients
            • Chapter 5. Law Firms and Associations
            • Chapter 6. Public Service
            • Chapter 7. Information About Legal Services
            • Chapter 8. Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession
          • Previous Rules
        • Selected Legal Authority
          • Constitution Excerpts
          • The State Bar Act
          • California Rules of Court
          • Statutes
      • Ethics
        • Hotline
        • Opinions
          • 2009-176 to Present
          • 1998-152 to 2008-175
          • 1992-126 to 1997-151
          • 1988-96 to 1991-125
          • 1984-76 to 1987-95
          • 1979-48 to 1983-75
          • 1971-24 to 1977-47
          • 1965-1 to 1970-23
        • Rules Spotlight Videos
        • Ethics Schools
          • Class Schedule
          • Ethics School FAQ
        • Ethics & Technology Resources
          • Ethics Opinions Related to Technology
          • Ethics Articles on Technology
          • Online Participatory MCLE Programs
          • Online Communication
          • Electronic Files
          • Law Firm Websites
          • Social Media
          • Internet/Email Scams
          • Miscellaneous
        • Senior Lawyers Resources
          • Rules
          • Opinions
          • Publications
            • Wellness Guide
          • Articles
          • MCLE
          • Links
          • Closing a Law Practice
          • Contact Us
          • Attorney Surrogacy
        • ADA Claims Information
        • Judicial Ethics
        • Attorney Civility and Professionalism
        • Publications
          • Ethics News
          • Ethics News Archive
          • Hotliner Articles
            • Archives
          • Pub 250
          • Compendium on Professional Responsibility Index
        • Committees
          • COPRAC
            • Education
              • Ethics Symposium
            • Opinion Requests
            • Rules
            • Roster
          • Rules Revision
            • Rules Commission 2014
              • Action Summaries
              • Meetings
              • Roster
    • Ethics
    • Legal Specialization
      • About Certified Specialization
      • Becoming a Certified Specialist
        • Exam Information
          • Exam Preparation Information
          • Laptop Computers
          • Testing Accommodations
      • Current Certified Specialists
      • Legal Specialty Areas
      • Specialist Search
      • MCLE Requirements for Certified Specialists
      • Education Providers
      • Governance
        • Board of Legal Specialization
          • Roster
      • Rules & Standards
        • Advertising
      • FAQ
    • Volunteer
      • Special Master
        • FAQ
        • Rules
        • List
  • Admissions
    • Requirements
      • Registration
      • Education
        • Pre-Legal Education
          • College Equivalency Education
        • Legal Education
          • Fixed Facility
          • Correspondence or Distance Learning
          • Law Office or Judge's Chamber
          • Foreign Education
            • Foreign Law Degree
      • Social Security Exemption
      • Attorney Applicants
      • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Examinations
      • Dates and Deadlines
      • Safelisting Tips for Email
      • California Bar Examination
        • July 2023 California Bar Exam
        • Laptops for Bar Exam
        • July 2023 Bar Exam FAQs
        • Instructions for Essay Questions and Performance Test
        • July 2023 Admittance Ticket Bulletin
        • Testing Centers
        • Hotel Information
        • California Bar Examination Scope
        • Exam Results
          • Bar Exam Pass List
        • Past Exams
        • Grading
        • Scaling
        • Refund of Fees Policy
        • Virtual Oath Packet
        • Attorney's Oath
      • First-Year Law Students' Examination
        • June 2023 First-Year Exam
        • June 2023 First-Year Exam FAQs
        • Admittance Bulletin
        • Exam Results
        • First-Year Exam Grading and Scope
      • Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
      • Requesting Testing Accommodations
      • Exam Administration
        • Becoming a Grader
        • Becoming a Proctor
    • Moral Character
      • Moral Character Statement
      • Governing Law
      • Process
      • Factors and Conduct
      • Further Investigation and Informal Conferences
      • Guidelines
    • Special Admissions
      • Multijurisdictional Practice (MJP) Program
        • MJP Program Requirements and Process
        • MJP Program Types
      • Pro Hac Vice
      • Out-of-State Attorney Arbitration Counsel (OSAAC)
      • Foreign Legal Consultants (FLC)
        • FAQ
        • Foreign Legal Consultants List
      • Practical Training of Law Students
      • Provisionally Licensed Lawyers
        • Search
    • Law School Regulation
      • Law Schools
      • Committee of Bar Examiners Meetings
        • Minutes
        • Minutes Archive
        • Roster
      • Exam Statistics
  • Access to Justice
    • Initiatives
      • California Justice Gap Study
        • Justice Gap Study Survey Data
        • California Law Student Survey Data
      • Publications
      • Leadership Banks
    • Pro Bono
      • Pro Bono Directory
        • Central Coast and Eastern Sierra
        • Central Valley Area
        • Los Angeles Area
        • Sacramento and Northern California
        • San Diego and Imperial Valley
        • San Francisco Area
        • Statewide
      • Pro Bono Practice Program
      • Volunteer Opportunities to Assist Veterans and Service Members
      • Volunteer After a Disaster
      • FAQ
    • Grants
      • Legal Aid Funding
      • 2023 Grant Recipients
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Lawyer Referral Services
    • Financial Institutions
      • IOLTA-Eligible Financial Institutions
  • News
Seal of The State Bar of California The State Bar of California

Frequently Asked Questions: May and Lazar Reports on Past Handling of Girardi Complaints

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Share with Email

On March 10, 2023, the State Bar released redacted versions of two reports detailing the past handling of complaints against now-disbarred attorney Thomas V. Girardi. The news release is here; the May report is here; the Lazar report is here.

This announcement follows the release in November 2022 of an open letter from Board of Trustees Chair Ruben Duran and disclosure of the list of past Girardi complaints. A separate FAQ on that disclosure is here.

  1. What is the May report?

In January 2022, the State Bar announced it hired the law firm of Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg LLP to examine how the State Bar handled complaints filed against disbarred attorney Thomas V. Girardi, and whether that process was affected by Girardi’s connections, to or influence, at the State Bar. During the 16-month investigation, Aaron May and his team reviewed over 950,000 documents, issued 23 subpoenas, and interviewed, either voluntarily or under compulsion, 74 witnesses. As a demonstration of its transparency and accountability to further the State Bar’s public protection mission, the Board is making the investigation report public.

  1. Why was Aaron May selected for the investigation?

Mr. May was chosen for his expertise, experience, and impeccable credentials. A founding partner of Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg LLP in Los Angeles, he specializes in internal corporate investigations, litigation, white collar criminal defense, and complex commercial. He also formerly served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles, prosecuting individuals and corporations for sophisticated federal financial crimes, including health care fraud, false claims, securities violations, criminal trademark and counterfeiting, tax violations, money laundering, and loan fraud. He has been practicing law in California since 2000.

  1. What were the key findings of the May report?

The May report indicates that Girardi intentionally cultivated relationships at the State Bar to increase his influence. The report details instances where past members of the State Bar Board, leadership, and staff accepted Girardi’s gifts and failed to report them. The report spotlights nine individuals at both staff and executive levels who exercised poor judgment, ignored or poorly handled conflicts of interest, or behaved unethically in other ways. Most events cited in the report occurred before 2018, and none of the individuals named in the May report are still at the State Bar.

At least nine Girardi cases were handled by employees who had a connection to, or appear to have received benefits from, Girardi or his law firm. All of those cases were closed without public discipline. Eight of those cases were closed by individuals who May determined had conflicts of interest at the time they worked on the cases. The report found that these conflicts of interest impacted their decisions on the cases.

  1. The May report uses titles instead of names of certain individuals. Why?

Mr. May named only those who his investigation indicated had connections or conflicts of interest with respect to Girardi or whose actions undermined conflict-of-interest procedures. Nevertheless, in the interests of transparency, we are providing additional names that we can disclose under applicable laws:

Anonymized Reference Page Reference or
first mention
Name
CTC 36 Robert Heflin
CTC 1 66 James Towery
CTC 2 13 Jayne Kim
...former Board member and President of the Board  23, 34 Craig Holden
Then-Board member 66 David Pasternak
Board member 75 Miriam Krinsky
OUTSIDE ATTORNEY C 11 Jerome Falk
OUTSIDE ATTORNEY D 69 Sean SeLegue
OUTSIDE LAW FIRM 11 Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin PC
GIRARDI CLIENT LITIGATION 70 Copple et al. v. Astrella & Rice, P.C. et al. (N.D. Cal. Case No. 3:05cv3961)
  1. What is the Lazar report?

In 2021, attorney Alyse Lazar reviewed 115 files of past closed complaints against Girardi. The purpose was to determine whether anything in the files indicated that case-handling decisions were influenced by personal or financial relationships with or benefit to any of the individuals who were involved, including State Bar employees and outside counsel assigned to handle cases when staff have conflicts of interest.

  1. What were the findings of the Lazar report?

While the Lazar report found no evidence of influence by Girardi in the files themselves, the findings noted errors in how cases were handled over the four decades of Girardi’s career. In particular, the report identified significant issues regarding the investigation and evaluation of high-dollar, high-volume trust accounts. The 2021 file review prompted several actions by the Board, including the retention of Aaron May to further examine the handling of the Girardi complaints as well as the creation of the Client Trust Account Protection Program. The Lazar report is being disclosed now in keeping with the Board’s commitment to transparency and accountability.

Taken together, the Lazar and May reports provide a clear and comprehensive review of how Girardi’s unethical and unacceptable behavior went unchecked for so long.

  1. Why are the reports redacted?

Redactions were made to ensure that the State Bar complies with applicable laws. The State Bar redacted case-related information that is confidential under California Business and Professions Code section 6086.1, which limits our ability to disclose information about investigations that did not result in formal charges to “confirming the fact of an investigation or proceeding, clarifying the procedural aspects and current status, and defending the right of the licensee to a fair hearing.” This law has a public protection purpose: it helps to ensure that complainants and witnesses feel comfortable coming forward and speaking freely when complaints are being investigated. Additional redactions relate to names and personal identifying information that is protected by the right to privacy; also, limited information was redacted at the request of law enforcement.  

  1. What is the State Bar doing about the findings?

The State Bar is a very different organization now. As noted earlier, the staff named in the May report are no longer at the State Bar.

In recent years, we have instituted many safeguards to both prevent unethical or corrupt behavior and ensure that if it does occur, it is caught and addressed quickly. Numerous reforms have been made to address some of the issues that both reports highlighted, to ensure that lapses like those that occurred in the Girardi matter never happen again.

These include:

  • More robust policies and procedures regarding conflicts of interest and gifts that recognize the importance of avoiding the appearance of impropriety and mandate frequent reporting.
  • Improvements in how the Office of Chief Trial Counsel reviews patterns of complaints.
  • New policies that limit the ability to close cases when a complainant withdraws a complaint.
  • Numerous steps to strengthen the Special Deputy Trial Counsel (Rule 2201) Program, which deploys outside counsel to handle cases when internal staff have conflicts.
  • Changes to the Board of Trustees itself. Some Trustees used to be elected by attorneys, introducing politics to the process. Now the entire Board is appointed, with an increased percentage of nonattorney public members.
  • Greater oversight by the Board of both the Chief Trial Counsel and the Special Deputy Trial Counsel Program, which are the two arms of the discipline system.
  • The Client Trust Account Protection Program, which requires all attorneys to report client trust account information to the State Bar for the first time, to improve attorney accountability and deter misconduct.
  • The recently launched Public Trust Liaison, whose role is to see to it that members of the public can meaningfully voice their complaints about State Bar action or inaction and have their concerns addressed; and 

In addition, a new committee of the Board, the Ad Hoc Committee on Oversight and Accountability Reforms, has been evaluating additional steps that should be taken.

  1. How much did the State Bar spend on these two reports?

The cost of the Lazar file review was approximately $25,000. The cost of the May report was approximately $1.2 million.

  1. When was the Ad Hoc Committee on Oversight and Accountability Reforms formed? Who sits on the committee?

The Ad Hoc Committee was formed in December 2022. The members of the committee are Trustees Arnie Sowell Jr., Hailyn J. Chen, and Melanie M. Shelby.

  1. What operational changes has the committee recommended and what’s the timeline for implementing them?

Staff is already taking steps to implement the committee’s recommendations for strengthening oversight, reporting, and training to prevent conflicts of interest. More information about these efforts can be found here.

After its members have fully considered the May report in conjunction with the Lazar report, the committee will make additional recommendations to further improve governance, oversight, and operations. The committee’s recommendations will be posted for public comment before being presented to the full Board of Trustees.

  1. Is the news report that Bob Hawley was serving as a Special Deputy Trial Counsel while being investigated true?

After leaving the State Bar having served in various roles, Mr. Hawley worked as a Special Deputy Trial Counsel (SDTC, also known as conflict counsel under Rule 2201). He served in this role between May 2019 and December 2021. In 2020, he handled four cases, none of them related to Girardi or his firm. Although his contracts as an SDTC allowed for compensation, he did not invoice for this work and was not paid for it. The Lazar report was conducted between March and May 2021. While the redacted version of the Lazar file review report mentions Mr. Hawley, it is only in relation to one case—in 2011—and states only that it was “appropriately handled by the outside examiner in coordination with State Bar staff.” (This staff reference refers to Mr. Hawley while he was employed by the State Bar.)

  1. Press reports indicate Mr. Hawley has also been involved in legal ethics education for the State Bar. What about that?

In February 2019, Mr. Hawley was asked to participate in an unreleased State Bar e-learning course based on his position as an adjunct law school professor teaching professional responsibility and his former roles at the State Bar. Staff prepared the script that he read from for these portions of the course, as they normally do for other participants. We will edit the portions of the course that include Mr. Hawley with a new speaker.


Bar Seal
Protecting the public & enhancing the administration of justice.
  • Public
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Admissions
  • Access to Justice
  • News
  • Forms
  • Careers
  • Staff Log in
  • San Francisco (Main Office)
    180 Howard St.
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    415-538-2000
  • Los Angeles
    845 S. Figueroa St.
    Los Angeles, CA 90017
    213-765-1000
Copyright © 2023 The State Bar of California
  • FAQ
  • User Policies
  • Contact
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn